|
What Kind of Person Was Hitler? A Brief Analysis of the Primary Sources Part 10
Hitler according to Peter Conradi’s Hitler’s Piano Player, Pub. Date 2004
[Although this is a secondary source, Ernst and Helene Hanfstaengl have been quoted verbatim, extensively, in this tract; hence, only their words will be presented here.]
“I still have a faith in Hitler and the future of his platform. I believe that he and his platform will save Germany” [69].
Hitler’s platform would have saved Germany if international Jewry had not been so bent on its utter annihilation. As soon as Hitler had renounced his country’s need for the World Bank(s), Jewry began mobilizing against him. What is somewhat interesting, is the fact that Jewry even worshipped the Golden Calf, as it were, during the days of the Old Testament. They certainly had not evolved from that ‘materialistic spirit’ when Hitler came up against them, and one may question whether or not they have evolved from that attitude at all, seeing as how they still head the World Bank (Paul Wolfowitz) and the America Federal Reserve (formerly Alan Greenspan, presently Ben Bernanke); all three of whom are Jewish. Perhaps it is merely coincidence, but, an intelligent person would seriously question that.
On the failed putsch: “What on earth can they do to me?” Hitler demanded. “All I have to do is to tell some of the things I know about von Lossow and the whole thing will collapse. Those in the know are well aware of this” [67].
“’It’s the end,’ he cried. ‘Let myself be arrested by these swine, never! I would be better off dead.’
The formidable Helene was having none of it: she calmly walked up to Hitler and took the gun away. He did not resist or even say a word.
‘What do you think you are doing?’ she demanded. ‘You have gotten all these people interested in your ideas about saving the country and now you are just going to take your life and leave them behind. They are rooting for you to carry on.’
Then, as the police waited outside, she produced a notebook. ‘Now look,’ she continued. ‘You’ve got all your workers depending on you. They have to know what to do. You are going to be incarcerated for awhile, there is no doubt about that. Tell me what you want each one of them to do and I will write it down.’
Hitler calmed down and began to dictate. He ran through the names of his small band one by one, telling Helene which tasks he wanted assigned to each” [66].
Hitler did this exact same thing just before Germany fell in 1945. I suppose one could say that this was a ‘fatal-flaw’ in his person; that he was weak on his own, but immeasurably powerful, influential, and self-assured with the presence and assistance of others. This makes sense.
Hitler did not do well at all on his own after his mother had passed away; indeed, he became homeless and had a very difficult time holding a job. Now, the horrible economic crisis had much to do with this, as Germany was in a state of political and financial chaos even at that time [5], due to the Versailles Death Warrant, so, Hitler is not wholly to blame for his youthful predicament.
Furthermore, he was still a teenager when this happened, and every parent certainly understands that a teen in a state of despair, and left all alone to his or her own undeveloped devices, is usually the recipe for failure, if not complete disaster! But, the fact of the matter is, even though Hitler seemed to be the type who did not necessarily adore socializing and social events, as he complained about these sorts of things quite often, he knew that he needed people around him, and I think it would be safe to say that he did, indeed, love people very much.
Hitler probably did not know how to express his love very well, which comes across in Eva Braun’s diaries and letters, and this seems to be a very common problem for most men, even today. I think that any serious scholar would be able to say that Eva and Adolf had a dysfunctional relationship; that Adolf would be best characterized as the ‘addict,’ and Eva, the ‘codependent.’
Moreover, Hitler tended to take everything to its extreme, even when he was really young, and his personality was very commanding; overbearing to most. Codependent women gravitate to men like Hitler, and this may well explain, at least partly, why so many unstable women were involved with him. Hitler could not understand this incomprehensible trait in women, as he had mentioned to Heinrich Hoffmann. Well, he would not have understood it if he had not acquired a little knowledge of female psychology. It would also explain why Hitler believed that women lived only for their husbands or boyfriends. His outlook was quite limited in this respect. But, if he only ever knew codependent women, it certainly makes sense. Suffice it to say, that Hitler could have used a few marriage counseling sessions. Some counseling is probably healthier than none at all, but, the science of sociology and psychology were ludicrous in Hitler’s day, so, it is probably better that he never went.
Hitler did appreciate everyone’s help and support, but he was a weak man, due to his aforementioned ‘fatal-flaw,’ and when push came to shove, Hitler chose the escape route, as opposed to ‘the Cross.’ But, let us not forget, he was a human being, and human beings are not expected to perform as well as Jesus did; that is why Jesus was chosen to bear the Cross, and not someone else.
I think that it is also worth mentioning that Hitler seems to have had an especially difficult time really connecting with people on a personal level. Wagener claimed that he had an extremely ineffective and naïve approach to judging human character and loyalty. I think, too, that it would be safe to say that Martin Bormann took advantage of his position directly under Hitler. He did not respect the Führer, but rather, withheld extremely valuable information from him, and probably undermined much of what Hitler had truly stood for.
Bormann was the creep who attacked the churches, withheld Jewish and Mischlinge clemency applications from Hitler, and may have been responsible for a great many orders that were issued from Hitler’s headquarters—especially in the latter half of the war. These “higher up” orders, as David Irving has oftentimes pointed out, may well have been issued without Hitler’s knowledge, especially if the Führer was on amphetamines practically all day long to even be able to function. It is now almost certain that he was suffering immensely from Parkinson’s Disease in those later years, and Hitler was being treated with amphetamines by Dr. Morell, although, unknowingly. This was addressed in a History Channel special, ‘High Hitler.’ Of course, the History Channel portrayed him as a drug-addict creep, but, this is to be expected, as the History Channel is controlled and produced by Jews. David Irving’s The Secret Diaries of Hitler’s Doctor is much more reliable in this respect.
The book, The Secretary, portrays Bormann as one of the most selfish and hideous men to have ever lived. Now, this may be a bit overkill as far as a negative portrayal is concerned, but facts are facts; Bormann was a hideous, murderous, treacherous, and godless man. If Hitler was a terrible judge of character and loyalty, as Wagener and Hanfstaengl have claimed, then it may well be true that he just did not see the wickedness of Bormann. He was known to have concealed his wretchedness quite well.
“At that time my only thought, day in, day out, was: where can I find material, models, suggestions and ideas for Hitler—ideas that would help him widen his emotional appeal” [47].
“A couple of years later, Hitler was to write in a letter to Alfred Rosenberg how he had come to know ‘a man whose fanaticism is divided into love of the movement and hatred for its enemies.’ Putzi, he said, ‘had become a friend to me personally.’ For Putzi… this man’s [Hitler’s] ‘brilliant gifts will take him to the top’” [47]. Putzi was one of the few who knew that Hitler was the only man who could resurrect Germany.
“Of all the Wagner operas, Die Meistersinger was his favorite” [169].
‘… No, Herr Hitler, the communists in New York did not get me after all,’ Putzi retorted, showing him a sheaf of press cuttings. Among them was the photograph of his handshake with Pinansky, the Jewish judge.
‘Nice friends you have,’ Hitler said. ‘What sort of propaganda is that for the Party when the foreign press chief is fraternizing with a Jew?’”
Hitler’s voting base supported him primarily because he was committed to combating the Judaisation of Germany. It is a fact that Jews capitalized upon Germany’s woes after World War I, and also played a crucial—if not dominant—role in the Versailles Treaty that demanded intolerable reparations payments from the German people. Hitler could not afford to have this sort of propaganda used against him.
“’My leader, Adolf Hitler, had to act and he acted thus as always. Hitler has proven himself never greater, never more human, than in the last forty-eight hours. Hitler would possibly have been on his way out if he had not acted as he did; if he had not acted and saved the most precious thing in the world—his providential mission.’ … ‘There will be others who will fill their places.’ Germany, he claimed, was marching on to a bright future, and Hitler ‘has not only averted ruin for Germany, but for the entire civilized world’” [163].
I am not certain why it is that historians attempt to portray Roehm as the innocent little victim, and Hitler as the villain, when it comes to the ‘Night of the Long Knives.’ First of all, Hitler was the one who had decided to go about acquiring power via the vote, as opposed to a bloody revolution, which is what Roehm wanted. Indeed, this may be the main reason why Roehm felt compelled to “off” Hitler. He wanted to spill torrents of blood in the streets, and this has been verified by Kurt Ludecke in I Knew Hitler.
Secondly, Roehm was a sleazy character, as he had led the life of a pederast, and we all know what that entails.
Thirdly, there is a sufficient amount of evidence available to historians that would certainly grant merit to the probability that Roehm was going to assassinate Hitler, or perhaps have someone else assassinate him. Only an imbecile would not act on that evidence. Hitler had reason to believe it was true, so Ernst Roehm lost his life. He should not have been involved in a plot, as he should have respected all that Hitler had done for him and given him, as opposed to wanting something more, or something different. We cannot always have exactly what we want.
Furthermore, there is also evidence that has come to the fore that suggests that Hitler was only aware of a few people who were to be assassinated, and his list was not 30 names long. David Irving has addressed this in Hitler’s War. One would do well to familiarize oneself with the whole story, meaning both sides, before coming to any definitive conclusions. As Degrelle, Bryan Rigg, and Otto Wagener, among others, have pointed out quite convincingly, it was not in Hitler’s nature to be unduly cruel.
In fact, if Hitler had really wished to commit a concerted genocide against Jewry, then he would have specifically targeted Jewish children, just as the current Jews in Israel are doing to Palestinian Arab children, as they were the upcoming generation who would have needed to be expunged. However, as history has shown, there are now currently nearly one million ‘Holocaust survivors’ worldwide, 61 years after the end of the alleged ‘Holocaust.’
So, naturally, if Hitler had indeed tried to exterminate Jews, he certainly did not target children, because those children—nearly 1 million of them—grew up, and many are living better than most people in the world today; here in America.
Moreover, I purchased a DVD entitled The Liberation of Auschwitz (which includes an introduction by Simon Wiesenthal) and was stunned to see infants, toddlers, and young children, as well as, physically disabled young people and elderly adults, alive and well, at the time of the alleged “liberation.”
According to eyewitnesses like Philip Müller: children, weak women, and the elderly were the first to be “gassed” in “gas chambers.” Now, if that is a true claim, then why were there so many elderly, weak women, physically disabled young people, and very young children alive,—most looked quite healthy, in fact, in this live Soviet-filmed footage—to be seen in this DVD?
This is the same video footage that was utilized during the Nuremberg Mass Murder Show Trial, which served to indict innocent men for “war crimes against humanity” that never even took place. The footage of the shrunken heads, Jewish soap, and Jewish lampshades was to be seen in this video, but, even Dr. Deborah Lipstadt (Jewess) has declared that all of this stuff was completely fake. Most of this footage was known to have been falsified or grossly exaggerated by the Soviets and was not wholly accepted even at the Mass Murder Show Trial.
Please visit the Zündelsite or Judicial-Inc. to learn more. Here is a new site dispelling the gross distortions and fabrications of the alleged ‘Holocaust’ story, all in audio/visual documentary format. Models, measurements, mathematics, and science are utilized on this site to disprove the official stories of the ‘many’ “death camps.”
Lastly, I will point up the fact that most of the Auschwitz inmates in this video footage appear quite healthy and happy, especially in light of the rampant Typhus outbreaks and mass starvation during the latter half of the War. Supplies could not get through because the Allies were bombing the railways carrying medical, food, and clothing supplies to the Eastern camps. The subsequent lack of supplies, and the deaths that ensued because of this shortage, was purely the fault of the Allied bombers.
Furthermore, in Bernard Lewis’s The Middle East, he has documented [p. 351] that the powerful Jewish organizations in Washington and London repeatedly requested the mass-bombing of Auschwitz during the latter half of the War. The questions is, why? I think I have finally found the answer to this seemingly elusive and incomprehensible question.
The Jewish organizations in Washington and London knew that Auschwitz was a mass-complex of labor camps and barracks for German armaments workers. These were the laborers who were producing Germany’s much needed war materiél, subsequently, these Jewish organizations would have wanted them utterly destroyed, in order to shorten the war, (by annihilating the German armaments industry.)
Knowing this now, we can assume that international Jewry (the Jews in Washington and London) would have willingly and knowingly committed a genocide against not only their own people, but Poles, homosexuals, Gypsies, Christians, and ethnic Russians alike, in order to shorten the war, so that they could move in sooner and play their role in the establishment of the NATO block. After all, NATO was just one more piece in the puzzle of the Military-Industrial Complex; an industry that has provided Jewish banks and businesses with billions of dollars.
Needless to say, this did not happen. Lewis claims that the only reason it did not was because it was not viewed as a means of shortening the war in the eyes of the Allied military forces. This may well be true, as a vast majority of German armaments production had been moved underground, and the Allies did not feel that killing all the internees at Auschwitz was worth it. This means that the Allied military forces felt more compassion towards the Jewish Auschwitz inmates than did their own brethren.
Hitler according to Ich Kämpfe, Orig. pub. Date 1943, this edition unknown
“We will pass away, but in you Germany will live on. And when there is nothing left of us you will have to hold in your fists the flag which we grubbed up out of the void” [140].”
“… that our work has not been in vain but that it will bear fruit for our people” [140].
“And you must be powerful so that this flag will never fall” [140].
“A healthy, large family is the greatest good. The party member chooses his wife early in life considering the principles of National Socialist racial selection” [140].
“Let your thinking and acting be clean. The party member fights obscenity. Without being asked to do so, he stands up for a woman’s honor always and everywhere” [140].
“When this war is over, I will return from it as a more fanatic National Socialist than I have ever been” [1941] [139].
“The behavior of a National Socialist is self-confident but never arrogant” [139].
“For us and for all those who will come after us, the Reich of the Germans will always be “Groβdeutschland” [130]!
“Our fallen heroes considered many things important enough to die for if necessary, and that is what we must be prepared to do whenever the time comes” [111].
“There is but one vocation and it lies only in combat. Hoist the banner of courage, sacrifices and devotion and watch who gathers round that banner. He who is attracted by the banner is called upon to lead a nation, and nobody else” [108].
“I want to ask the young to look up to their predecessors in the Movement as examples so that they will realize that there is nothing superficial in being a National Socialist. It is not a matter of clothes, meetings and stars… but it is the heart that matters! … For them it is not enough to simply confess ‘I believe’ but to take the oath:
“I Fight” [107].
|