|
What Kind of Person Was Hitler? A Brief Analysis of the Primary Sources Part 5
Hitler according to Erwin Rommel’s The Rommel Papers, Orig. pub date 1953, Ed. By B.H. Liddell-Hart
“… It was at a time when Hitler was very worried about Italy, which appeared to be about to collapse at any moment. My father felt that this was the time to give Hitler his views on the general war situation. … Germany would, of course, produce more arms and ammunition as a result of the total mobilization of labor which was being introduced in 1943. “But even then,” he asked, “can we keep pace with the whole world” [emphasis added]? Germany was indeed fighting nearly the entire Western world, which was most regrettably being completely supported morally and financially by Bolshevist-Jewish macro-elites and macro-politicians, as well as, their international collaborators.
Hitler listened to it all with downcast eyes, my father said. Suddenly he looked up and said that he, too, was aware that there was very little chance left of winning the war. But the West would conclude no peace with him—certainly not the people who were then at the helm. And the people who would have been prepared to negotiate with him had no power. He had never wanted war with the West. But now the West would have their war—have it to the end” [427-28].
Contemplate it… white Western European peoples shamelessly and needlessly slaughtered one another in one of the bloodiest wars in history. For anyone to act as though one human being—Adolf Hitler—was solely responsible for this insanity, is to wholly lie to oneself. The true harbingers of the war-mongering spirit, as history is slowly revealing, were the Jewish-influenced Allies. Even Henry Ford, Sr. pointed this out in his book The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem.
Ford wrote, “… No, it was precisely the Jews who led the Russian proletariat to the dawn of the Internationale and not only have led, but are also now leading the Soviet cause which remains in their safe hands. It is true that there are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are concerned, but in the committees and Soviet organizations, as commissars, the Jews are gallantly [mis]leading the masses of the Russian proletariat to victory. … The symbol of Jewry, which for centuries has struggled against capitalism, has become also the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen even in the adoption of the Red five-pointed star, which in former times, as it is well known, was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry. … Mr. Cohan [Jew] says, ‘The symbol of Jewry… has become also the symbol of the Russian proletariat’” [The International Jew 242]. It is really tragic what had happened to the great Russian people. They were deceived and murdered en masse by a godless rabble, and when the rabble was through with them, they simply fled to a safe haven and left the Russian people to suffer their ill-begotten collective fate. Russia still has not recovered from the Bolshevik terror, but it seems as though Putin is beginning to put his country on the right track.
“The Star of David, the Jewish national emblem, is a six pointed star, formed by two triangles, one standing on its base, the other on its apex. Deprived of their base lines, these triangles approximate the familiar Masonic emblem of the Square and Compass. It is this Star of David of which a Jewish observer in Palestine remarks that there are so few among the graves of the British soldiers who won Palestine in the recent war: most of the signs are the familiar wooden Cross. These crosses are now reported to be objectionable to the new rulers of Palestine, because they are so plainly in view of the visitor who approaches the new Jewish university” [Ford 243]. Clearly, Mr. Ford was upset at the ungrateful attitude displayed by the new conquerors of Palestine.
Mr. Ford went on to say something very uncanny and prophetic, “… the Bolshevik Star has one point less than the Star of David. For there is still one point to be fulfilled in the World Program as outlined in the Protocols—and that is the enthronement of ‘our leader.’ When he comes, the World Autocrat for whom the whole program is framed, the sixth point may be added. The Five Points of the Star now apparently assured are the Purse, the Press, the Peerage, Palestine and Proletarianism. The sixth point will be the Prince of Israel” [Ford 243-44].
What I find most interesting about this passage, and the incredible foresight that Mr. Ford had, is the fact that he noticed that the Jewish-Bolshevik Star was a five-sided pentagram—the star of Satan himself. Naturally, it makes sense that when this “World Autocrat” comes upon the seen, he will make up that missing point, and perhaps this will signify the ushering in of the prophesied “system of Antichrist,” whereupon people will be coerced into taking the “mark of the Beast.” It is curious that the Jews had Christ murdered and are still awaiting their prophesied Messiah. This Messiah can only be Antichrist if one is to look at this rationally, as nothing else makes any sense.
Hitler would not succumb to Jewish-Bolshevist masochism, so he stayed true to his word and defended his people, his nation, and his ideals to the very end. How could anyone possibly believe that the Allies wanted peace? Hitler’s attempts at reasonable negotiation were tossed asunder, as the Allies would have rather seen all of Europe enslaved by the murderous Bolshevist killing machine, than share power with Hitler. The only irrationality I can see, upon honest reflection, is that of America and Britain—two countries that had succumbed to liberalism, egalitarianism, communism, Marxism, and deception. Both countries are presently paying the price for the mistakes they made nearly seventy years ago. It seems to me that the only reason Europe has not really prospered is due to the impediments bestowed upon her by her repressive Zionist shackles. I may be incorrect, but this is how I conceive of the situation in the world today.
“If the German people are incapable of winning the war,” Hitler had said, “then they can rot.” In any case, the best were already dead. If he was to be beaten, he would fight for every house, nothing would be left. A great people must die heroically—it was a historic necessity” [428].
Hitler had certainly become a hard-liner, if he had indeed said these types of things, by 1943. Even though he realized that the war for Europe’s salvation was lost, he was not going to be smote out by a murderous Jewish rabble if there was ever even the slightest chance of a reversal. He had a habit of clinging on to the slightest inkling of hope, even when things were going horrendously bad, because he had had such immense success all his life. It was only natural that he had come to think this way. It is a shame that Roosevelt and Stalin did not die sooner, because if they had, the world would certainly be much happier, safer, and more pleasant for everyone—as opposed to happier for just a few mega-elite nations. Unfortunately for posterity, Jewish propaganda was too powerful during the latter half of WWII, and the Jewish rabble was able to deceive the German people en masse, subsequently turning them against their own leader and government.
“The Fuehrer’s visit was wonderful. He greeted me with the words: ‘Rommel, we were very worried about you during the attack.’ His whole face was radiant and I had to accompany him afterwards. I was the only division commander who did” [Rommel Papers 43].
“… During the evening conference, the Fuehrer kept studying air photographs of Ventotene, the island where Mussolini is held prisoner. He kept Doenitz and Student back to discuss the liberation of Mussolini…” [441].
And Hitler wrote Rommel 3 November 1942: “Your enemy, despite his superiority, must also be at the end of his strength. It would not be the first time in history that a strong will has triumphed over the bigger battalions. As to your troops, you can allow them no other road than that to victory or death” [321].
This was indeed a harsh order, and Rommel claimed that he was “shocked” by it, however, it was this immeasurable will that allowed the Viet Minh to triumph over the most superior army in the world, the United States military. Furthermore, the will of the Iraqis, as well as the insurgent fighters in Iraq and surrounding areas, is another demonstration of this awesome display of sheer will. That is what Hitler admired most… the strength of the will. In fact, Americans would do well to remember that the sheer will to win is what earned us our independence from Great Britain.
Hitler according to A.P. Laurie’s The Case for Germany, Pub. Date 1939
“It is with admiration and gratitude for the great work he has done for the German people that I dedicate this book to the Führer” [Dedication].
“It has often been said here of the Führer that he was ‘only a house painter’ or that he had ‘no education’, and the general tendency of opinion in England is that he was not a public school man and therefore is not much good. … It is an error which we in Scotland are not likely to fall into, as so many of our famous Scotsmen have come from a similar stock, and have had a similar upbringing and education to that of the Führer” [11].
“…, are our equivalent to the highest type of European peasant, who produces a Mussolini, and a Hitler, and the small farmers of America who produced and Abraham Lincoln” [11].
“His final decoration, the Iron Cross of the First Class, was won for capturing single handed a small French force and leading them back to his own trenches by sheer bluff and personality” [13].
“He has denounced the folly of conquering and subduing foreign peoples. … He was horrified when he visited as a young man the Austrian parliament, and found it full of Slavs who were making long speeches in languages which only a few could understand, and whose racial hatreds finally boiled up into a free fight” [17].
“… he had come to the conclusion that a revolution based on a coup d’etat did not provide a permanent foundation on which to build a new state, and determined to undertake the colossal task of converting the whole German people and obtaining power by their votes” [16].
“… The love of the Reich has become a living and consuming flame. Hitler has seized upon that and directed it to an ethical aim. … He will accept no class division; he will stamp out all class war” [29].
“When Hitler first got control there were six million unemployed in Germany. To-day there is a strong shortage of workmen, and Italian, Dutch, and Polish workmen are being brought in. … Our plan of paying men the dole and allowing them to loaf in idleness is utterly abhorrent to the German mind. … Clothed, fed, and housed, and his family looked after, the German unemployed are glad to work” [31].
This passage tells us two very important things about Hitler. Firstly, that he was not a “racist,” because he invited foreign laborers to come work in his country. Secondly, he fulfilled all of his economic promises that he had made to the German people before he was elected, unlike the American “flip-flop” politicians of today. In America, we do not know what we are voting for, as our politicians lie about their platforms, and then show their true colors once they are in office. This is just one reason why Americans do not vote. I am registered as an Independent myself. Furthermore, Hitler did not allow his people to continually draw from welfare, as they had to get jobs as quickly as possible. America needs to learn from this and work to revitalize its enormous mass of unemployed workers.
For instance, I am sick and tired of hearing people tell me that African Americans do not want to work. I have a very hard time believing that a huge number of our African American population willingly chooses gang membership over employment. Perhaps if they were paid a living wage and respected, they might opt to choose employment more readily. I have known too many hard-working African Americans—one of my best friends during my childhood was A.A.—to accept this cop-out. Perhaps a good starting point would be the collective refusal to hire illegal immigrants over American citizens.
“Secondly, in Mein Kampf, there are many long references to Great Britain, and all of them are couched in tones of great appreciation. Hitler says that if German statesmen had had sufficient foresight to conclude an alliance with England early in the twentieth century, as Japan did in 1904, there would have been no Great War” [Laurie 51].
“The aggressive party in Europe to-day is not the Nazi party but the followers of Karl Marx [Jew] whether they call themselves Communists or Socialists” [65].
Something that really troubles me is the comparison of Bush and Hitler, or the comparison of America’s foreign policy with that of Hitler’s Nazi-Sozi foreign policy. I have already written extensively on the immeasurable differences between Bush and Hitler, so I will not focus on this too much here, but I have not really delved much into the realm of foreign policy.
Bush is a Judeo-Christian, an internationalist, and a globalist, as opposed to Hitler, who was a true Christ-Socialist [as argued by Steigmann-Gall in The Holy Reich], a staunch anti-internationalist, and an ardent isolationist. Contrary to the fairytale versions of the Hitler of history, Hitler never wanted to “take over the world.” In fact, America seems to be the one who is “taking over the world,” as it has clearly waged more war, deposed more governments and leaders, and established more bases around the world than any other nation-state in history, in the world! Furthermore, Bolshevist-Jews seemed to be more apt to “take over the world” during Hitler’s day, as they were the ones endorsing and spreading Communism, via the Soviet Comintern, all throughout the world, including Korea, China, Vietnam, and parts of South and Central America.
Hitler wanted to share power with the United States and Great Britain—he did not wish to make Germany the world hegemon—but Jewry did not want that to happen, because Hitler was too much of a threat to the Jewish-led world economic order. Myriad scholars have written on this subject, so I need not get into it here, but, I will recommend a few books on the matter: Pawns in the Game, SS: Freemasonry, Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant, Hitler’s Table-Talk, The International Jew, Onward Christian Soldiers, and The Iron Curtain Over America. I own all of these books and can attest to their immeasurable value.
“I thank God that the Peace of Europe is in the guardianship of the Führer and therefore, is spite of the frantic efforts of all those here and in Europe and America who want war, secure” [Laurie 179].
“This is the real quarrel that we [Gr. Britain] and the U.S.A., the two big money lenders, have with her [Hitler’s Germany]. If she came to the “city” to borrow £ 100 millions all the attacks in the Press, the denunciations on platforms, the utilization of the fugitive Jew as a political stunt would stop. The City pulls the strings and the Press obey” [emphasis original] [134].
“Hitler feels that Protestantism, which originated in Germany, is especially and peculiarly the type of Christianity which has become the national faith of the German people, and [he] is most desirous to see it working in harmony with the National Socialist State. To-day some 80% of the [German] churches are working in harmony with the Government. A section refuse to administer the simple regulations of the Government, and attack it violently from the pulpit,…” [110].
“Why kill Germans when we can starve them” (Senator Pittman quoted by A.P. Laurie in The Case for Germany]. Hitler has said, “I am no student of modern economics, and I must believe that the German who by his labor produces an article of use, such as food, has enriched and not impoverished the Reich” [119]. This quote alone should suffice as to how simple, yet utterly clear-thinking, Hitler could be. He defied the worldwide absurdity of Jewish economics, hence, he and his nation were liquidated.
Pertinent quotes from heroes of history who openly opposed Jewry…
Adolf Hitler Mein Kampf
Benjamin Franklin
"Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou[gh] they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention. "
Jesus Christ New Testament "Be careful," Jesus said to them. "Be on your guard against the yeast of the John 8:44 ”You [Jews] belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” Martin Luther The Jews and their Lies "He did not call them Abraham's children, but a 'brood of vipers' [Matt. 3:7]. Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, 'He has a demon' [Matt 11:18]. Our Lord calls them a 'brood of vipers'; furthermore in John 8:39-44 he states: 'If you were Abraham's children ye would do what Abraham did.... You are of your father the devil.' It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham's but the devil's children, nor can they bear to hear this today."
|