A Close Examination of Otto Wagener’s Hitler: Hitler—Memoirs of a Confidant

AHRS

 

Wagener’s Hitler

 

Interestingly enough, Otto Wagener had no reason to apologize for Hitler, nor to present a “whitewashed” version of Germany’s greatest leader. Not only had Wagener had a “falling out” with Hitler in the year, June 1933 (p. ix) but, more importantly, his wife had claimed that he was nearly executed (p. xiii). Now, this may well have been a fabrication on either Otto or his wife’s behalf, but nevertheless, Wagener was put in jail and allegedly only freed with the help of friends. He had fallen out of favor with Hitler, according to his own account, due to his taking advantage of the ousting of Alfred Hugenberg, prematurely. Hitler was actually going to offer Wagener the post until he found out that Wagener had greedily been pushing for that post before Hitler had decided upon a fitting successor (xii). In light of all this fallout, Wagener nevertheless presents an honest and fair portrayal of Hitler, and it is far from the monster we so often read about in our school books.

 

Jewry as the Demise of Both Russia and America

 

According to Wagener (1985) Hitler felt that Germany was especially endangered, due to its geographic proximity to Bolshevist Russia. So, even though he understood that the Red subversion worked within the Comintern, and hence, sought to revolutionize the world, he nevertheless took the position that proximity would eventually endanger German sovereignty (p. 58). In fact, Hitler had informed Wagener that it was not Slavs or Russians that worried him, but rather, Jewish-Bolshevik thinking. He had argued that Communist Slavs would have been excellent potential allies against America’s growing hegemony—Hitler believed that the term democracy had actually been derived from the word daemon, the devil; not demos, the people—but, that Slavs who thought like Jews would undoubtedly serve as Germany’s future enemies (Wag[ener], pp. 167-168). Hitler said, “…I see Jewry’s determination to use Russia as a springboard from which to direct the removal of the existing order in other nations as well! For the organization of the Comintern is purely Jewish” (Wag, p. 167)! In other words, Hitler did not see the Slavs as the enemies in this case, but rather, their Jewish rulers. But, Hitler believed that in order for the Slavs to have allowed Jewry to have overthrown them in the first place meant that they must have had some inherent flaw, or cultural weakness, to begin with. He did not want to ethnically cleanse the Slavs; he [ultimately] wanted to Germanize them. He even wished to see the Ukraine as the breadbasket of a “Greater Europe.” He had told Wagener that he would like to see the fruition of a coalition of nation-states in Europe and the Middle East—the United States of the old world.

 

Hitler had said of the Russians, during a speech in June, 1941:

 

You probably all felt that this was a bitter and difficult step for me. The German people have never had hostile feelings toward the peoples of Russia. During the last two decades, however, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have attempted to set not only Germany, but all of Europe, aflame. Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist worldview to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule. They have attempted this not only intellectually, but above all through military means (“Der Führer an das deutsche Volk 22. Juni 1941,” Bouhler, pp. 51-61).

 

“In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial [USSR] and brutal fist [Jewish commissars]…Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded, until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen…The democratic people’s Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant [Lenin/Stalin] over peoples…The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people.” [Hitler, pp. 325-26]

 

Hitler is most certainly telling the truth, as the present-day Jewish Neo-cons in America are guilty of the exact same crime, as were the Jewish-Bolsheviks in Hitler’s day. The Jews try and force other peoples and nations to accept their worldview, but, it simply cannot be done—at least, not without a long, bloody conflict. Then, if these ‘others’ refuse to accept this Jewish worldview, they are instantly labeled as either “madmen who want to dominate the world, and commit genocide against Jews,” or, “terrorists who want to kill Jews and Americans.” But, any discerning mind knows that this is purely speculative and sensationalized nonsense, as their exists not one shred of proof that these ‘others’ are either “world dominating and genocidal madmen” or “terrorists.” Jewry has the burden of proof, once again; and, once again, they have failed to deliver the evidence. Why Jewry fails to comprehend this is beyond this researcher, but the fact remains, Jewry has always been at the forefront of harmful ideologies. Dr. Kevin MacDonald, God Bless him, has argued this incredibly thoroughly in his trilogy series. He takes the position that Jews have utilized various ideologies, such as Communism and Liberalism, in order to promote and protect their own interests—usually at the immeasurable expense of other groups. According to Dr. MacDonald, it is an “evolutionary group strategy” (see Culture of Critique for full account of Judaism as an evolutionary group strategy). Hitler believed this to be the case, as well.

 

Indeed, Hitler had told the American-based Chicago Tribune, on 15 February 1931:

 

The USA has become a state as a result of liberalist ideas and various other factors, through financial monopolies too. But they will never be a nation: they will always be the scene of internal disturbances, ideological, religious, ethnic and religious rivalries. The USA will be overtaken by events (Brockschmidt, 2005).

 

Hitler believed that all of this was the result of America’s Jewry and, that Germany would share this same chaotic fate if she were to succumb to Jewish-Bolshevist rule.

 

He also said, “The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life. And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system.

 

In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution” (Hitler, 1937).

 

As evidenced in these passages above, Hitler certainly believed that Jews should never be allowed to exact a significant political influence over the Germans in their own nation; and, he clearly believed that America would eventually collapse under the strain, within the socio-political sphere, of Jewish domination. To act as though Hitler was “evil” for not wishing to allow non-Germans to dictate to Germans in their own country is bizarre, at best. The nation was named Germany after the Germans, and the German people were the only ones Hitler answered to. To act as though this was wrong is just plain bigoted. Does the modern-day Jewish government in Israel answer to the Jews or the Arabs? Amazingly enough, Palestine was named after the Philistines, or Palestinians, not the Jews—it is not their country, as it rightfully belongs to the Semitic Arabians. So, Jewry practices, in a nation that does not even rightfully belong to them, exactly what Hitler had practiced in his own nation against Jewish foreigners. Yes, it is a lot to comprehend, but comprehend it you must. Jewish bigotry is truly unprecedented. This is something one must learn through studying the Third Reich, if nothing else.

 

Hitler Not So Insensitive After All?

 

Interestingly enough, Hitler had informed Wagener that he did not dismiss people out of disregard for their personal feelings, or for any other ‘personal’ reasons. Hitler said, “I shall not allow the splendid structure of the SA to be broken up or alienated; I shall not endanger it by giving in to the wishes of the Gauleiter! No! I’ll take over the command myself, and the complaints will cease… On the one hand, I don’t want to make Pfeffer my chief of staff after his having already been supreme commander. That would be seen as a camouflaged action or self-deception on my part.” Here, we can clearly see that Hitler was resolving the dilemma simply by talking about it with another person. According to Wagener (1985), this was how Hitler came to resolutions on various matters and issues; he had to talk and think out loud. Oftentimes, he would give a short monologue in support of the ‘either’ and the ‘or,’ and only after he had given each option its due consideration, usually aloud, would he take a position and make a final decision, or order.

 

Oftentimes his Gauleiters and adjutants would mistakenly or deliberately act on his thoughts without first waiting for him to commit his final decision(s) to paper. Bormann deliberately did this quite often, but keep in mind, Bormann probably did not do this out of defiance, necessarily, but may have actually begun to distrust Hitler’s leadership abilities—especially during the latter half of his reign. Bormann more than likely usurped Hitler’s power to help Hitler and the nation, as opposed to hurting them. Also, keep in mind, Hitler did not write. He occasionally jotted notes and doodled, but he never wrote anything down. The alleged Hitler Diaries have already been exposed as fraudulent by David Irving. The only writings we have are his letters and notes, and there are not that many. So, we must take Hitler’s adjutants at their word in this regard. Hitler was the type of thinker who had to think aloud, and he resolved problems in his own mind and developed his train of thought as he spoke. Some people do not think clearly unless they verbalize their thoughts.

 

Hitler went on to say: “On the other hand, I can’t put Pfeffer into a newly created higher post. That would open the way to the suspicion that I was under his domination, and agitation against him would continue.

 

“Pfeffer must therefore be sacrificed, without any guilt on his part and contrary to my true opinion. If he is sacrificed on some pretext or other, the mutiny by his opponents will be stilled. The SA will remain completely intact, and I shall take over the leadership and thereby give to the party the guarantee that the SA can never revolt against the political organization.”

 

“…Wagener, politics is a peculiar business. But without politics one doesn’t get anywhere. So I practice politics even within the movement.”

 

Wagener objected. “But Herr Hitler! That’s not really right. Look, people cling to you with glowing enthusiasm, with trusting love. They sacrifice themselves and their free time, sometimes even their entire livelihood, to you and to the movement. And you advance them or let them drop—out of political considerations! Here, Wagener clearly does not understand that it is not about individuals, but the German nation. These people were not supposed to be giving their love and lives to Hitler, but to the cause of the German nation.

 

“But you don’t need to do that; it’s not necessary! You’d said earlier that you’d listened to the insinuations against him and forgotten them. And what did you do about those insinuations? Instead of confronting Pfeffer and me with them, you want to sacrifice Pfeffer, as you say, contrary to you own opinion! Then those intriguers will think that they have won and been successful! And they will have succeeded! You must sacrifice the intriguers and keep Pfeffer! How can you expect in the long run that people will continue to commit their hearts to you if you do not also unconditionally give yours to them?”

 

Hitler replied, “My heart belongs to the German Volk. To it alone. We all have a single task and duty: to serve our Volk. And the only thing I ask myself is: how can I best serve it? The fate of an individual, even my own [fate], cannot make me so soft as to transgress against the destiny of the Volk. Therefore, I believe I must sacrifice Pfeffer, it will happen solely in the interest of the great cause, in the interest, at bottom, of the Volk” (Wag, p. 29).

 

Hitler went on to say that he was not sure how to let Pfeffer go, as he did not want to hurt him any more than that which would be inflicted upon his dismissal, but that he [Pfeffer] would need to at least begin to restrain himself to lessen the growing agitation against him. Hitler also remarked that Pfeffer mouthed off his “cutting and sarcastic” opinions with regards to others, even when he was not asked to do so. In light of this escalating clash of personalities within the SA, Hitler informed Wagener that he would indeed keep Pfeffer on board, just not as supreme commander of the SA. He wanted him to join the ranks of his Reichstag deputies. So, Hitler did not just toss his supporters out without due consideration, and he almost always offered them a different position within the party, SA, or SS unless they had done something most regrettable.

 

The most important thing to grasp from this conversation is Hitler’s honest and open commitment to his country and the German people. Hitler always put the people above individuals, even above himself when necessary, and this is what made him so incredibly popular and well-loved. His sincerity emanated from his person; one need only read the transcripts of his speeches and monologues, comparing them with opportunists and liars like Bush, Roosevelt, Churchill, Lenin, Stalin, or any number of self-serving politicians, to really get the gist of Hitler’s political devotion. Now, Wagener understood Hitler’s position, but he was repelled by the fact that individuals had to be sacrificed for the common good. But, Hitler’s method is what made him a stellar politician and leader; the fact that he served the country and not money, himself, or particular elites or individuals within the party. Couldn’t we say that Jesus had also sacrificed the concept of the individual in favor of the common good? This is what true socialism is all about; not the Jewish-Bolshevist conception of communal slave labor, mass starvation, enslavement to the state, atheism, secularism, and the leveling-down of the proletariat. Hitler made it his duty to raise the level of the proletariat. He did not wish to mass murder the bourgeoisie, as he had realized that though they were selfish, pompous, and flawed, they were also a necessary component of the State structure. This is something that Wagener could not quite grasp at the time, as he had felt that Hitler was being insensitive and opportunistic. As Hitler’s record has shown, that just was not the case. Churchill was insensitive and opportunistic.

 

Furthermore, this conversation also informs us as to Hitler’s actual personal acknowledgment of the fact that he knew that he was sometimes perceived as being opportunistic and insensitive. So, Hitler was aware that these thoughts were churning in the minds of at least a few of his supporters and adjutants. Yet, historians act as though he was so far removed from human normalcy that he could not have possibly understood the thoughts, considerations, and feelings of others. Obviously, that was not the case. He may have seemed insensitive on an individual basis, but to the German people that could not have been more inaccurate. Hitler placed his accountability to his people first.

 

Lastly, this conversation points up the fact that Hitler did not want his adjutants to put their love and faith in him personally; rather, he wanted them to put themselves, as he had, in the service of the Volk and Fatherland. Hitler never demanded or asked that his subordinates adhere so ardently and fanatically to his person, as this was a phenomenon that had revealed itself over time. Hitler had a way about him that made people love him and want to do whatever he asked them to do. There was just something magnificent about him, and all of his adjutants and subordinates have described this in their respective memoirs in great detail. But to act as though this was Hitler’s fault is just ridiculous. He could not prevent his followers from living for him as opposed to the nation if that was what they were determined to do. Hitler just tried to harness their commitment; thus, putting them into the service of the German people through their commitment to his person. But, it was never about Hitler. It was about the people. This dovetails nicely with Hitler’s thoughts on the churches and religious authorities whom he believed had always served to the detriment of the people. He also wanted to mend those Christian institutions and priests who had gone astray and had inflicted harm upon the German populace.

 

Hitler: Economics and Rebirth of the Nation

 

Wagener (1985) had said, “I think I should begin with the concept of money and capital.” Hitler asked, “Have you studied the subject?” Wagener replied, “Studied may be putting it too strongly. I’ve attended lectures on it and read a number of things. And I gave some lectures on aspects of economic policy. But what I want to present is something which, if it is correct and realizable, will profoundly shake the bases of economic policy.”

 

“Wagener, there is no way we can avoid such shocks. That is precisely the most profound secret of the entire revolution we are living through and whose leadership it is our mission to seize; that there has to be overthrow, demolition, destruction by force! The destruction must be meaningful, not senseless, as under [Jewish-Russian] Bolshevism [nothing more than a Jewish bloodbath]. And it can only become meaningful if we have understood the goal, the purpose, the necessity [read: survival].

 

“Science, economics, and traditional practice—but also the entire concept of law, all the way to universal human rights—all are erected on the individualistic approach of the thousand-year-old past—erected and contrived by men of this ideology. It has colored all the feelings, perceptions, even the ethics and religious beliefs of these people.

 

“They will not understand our logic; they will condemn our thinking; they will convict our new ethics; and they will shower and persecute us with all the hatred of which an ideology doomed to destruction is capable in order to fight off, to suppress, to strangle an awakening ideology that will overthrow everything that existed previously. The execution of this great transformation must be left to youth. And if the old should succeed in restraining us and hindering our work, then there is no help for them, then Bolshevism will descend on them—the Bolshevism [read: Jewish-Satanism] that it is our sacred goal to save the world from. With brutal ruthlessness it will crush underfoot and stamp out everything their incompetent egotism attempts to defend. A Sodom and Gomorrah will rise, such as we have already seen in Russia! Only after decades of suffering will the new come into being and rise from the ruins of that collapsed ideology and world—the new of which we have a presentiment and which it is our hope to see more clearly” (pp. 44-45). [emphasis added]

 

Hitler went on to exclaim, “I do not want to fight against England, nor do I want to act against England. …Rather, I look to the East for work and bread for the excess millions living in Germany. There is room in the East! There are opportunities in the East! The danger of Bolshevism even requires us to man the front to the East. A Central Europe, a Ukraine, all under German [dominion], solve all the problems of the plight of the peoples of Europe. Who could reject such an idea? What objection could England have to it? Even the Near East is secured by German influence along the coast of the Aegean and the Black Sea” (Wagener, p. 53). Hitler viewed the treaty with Poland as the first step towards the consolidation of Central Europe under a Greater German Reich—the ultimate goal: to save all Europeans from Jewish-Bolshevism and enslavement.

 

As evidenced by the above passages, Hitler did appear to be very naïve, but, perhaps also a bit haughty with regards to his plans for German expansion; but, keep in mind, his goal was not to plunder and enslave the other Europeans under the German plowshare. His goal was “to solve all of the problems” created by Jewish-Bolshevism and, ultimately, to “save the world” from it.

 

Theological-Historical Application

 

Hitler took it upon himself to assume the responsibility for this pro-human task, and it is no different than Nasrallah’s and Ahmad’s defense of the Palestinian-Arabian peoples suffering and dying daily under the Jewish wrath of Satanism and hatred. Hitler saw Jewish rule for what it really was: murder, suffering, impoverishment, enslavement, death, chaos, internal strife, and hatred. The Jews ruled over the Russians like bestial demons sent by Satan himself. The cruelty, brutality, and oppression under the Jewish yoke of tyranny was relentless and unwavering in its brutality. As many as 45 million [Michael Hoffmann’s figure] perished under Vlad Lenin, and his crony, Josef Stalin—both crypto Jews. Hitler did not wish for this true reign of terror to befall anyone else if he could help it. He was not perfect, and perhaps he let his boys take things too far in the East on too many occasions, but Hitler—the man—meant well.

 

Brutality, cruelty and racism always rear their ugly heads in times of war [it happened in Vietnam]—when the young and confused minds of boys have been propagandized against the enemy—but, Hitler did the best he could with the people he had. For instance, the Muslim insurgents and freedom fighters do not all exercise the restraint and professionalism exhibited by such organizations as that of Hezbollah but, one cannot judge the entire insurgency, the Muslim world, or even a single Muslim organization based on the brutality of some of its members. That is not only completely childish and immature, but it is dangerous and irrational, as well. Indicting Hitler for Himmler’s racism and asininity on the front is like indicting George W. Lenin for atrocities ordered by, and committed by, his generals and soldiers. That is ludicrous.

 

G. W. would only be accountable, and therefore indictable, if he chose to overlook their crimes. Now, he has overlooked the war crimes committed by Satan-rael, during their heinous Lebanon Bloodbath Campaign 2006; thus, he ought to be indicted for that. Rumsfeld chose to “overlook” the fact that Saddam was going to use American-made WMDs against the Iranians and Kurds. Therefore, he is indictable. Hitler, on the other hand, ordered his men not to commit crimes when they came to his attention. David Irving, the historian and master archivist, has turned up countless instances that serve to exonerate Hitler from indictment in this regard. Hitler was the one who restrained his men; Hitler was upset at the events of Kristallnacht, and he reprimanded Goebbels for what he had done; Hitler was the one who put the brakes on at Dunkirk, allowing some 350,000 of the “Blood Jew” Churchill’s war pawns to flee; lastly, Hitler was the one who actually took the time to look out for the irreverent Jews. And yet, they have the mendacity to indict Hitler as the devil’s agent when they have been the “devil’s children” since the beginning. This is ludicrous. Jesus said that the Jews were Satanists all along, and that when they lied, it was as though they were speaking the only truth that they knew. For them, lies are self-evident truths. Bizarre…yes, but quite true. Jews are “deadly nuts.” Just look at Churchill, Lenin, Mao, Stalin, and Roosevelt—all partakers of Judaism, in one of its blasphemous forms or another. Even Jews admit that Communism is Judaism. Read Deuteronomy some time, and tell me that that is not the Bolshevik mind-set all over again. Jews have been murderers from the beginning, and Lucifer was not kidding when he told them, “You will have no other gods before me.” They slaughtered Christ because He set Himself up as the true God—the purveyor of God’s Word and will. Jesus had somewhat lamented, “If my followers were of this world [of which I conceive], then they would keep me from being handed over to the Jews. As it is, they are not of this world.” Indeed, Hitler had equated Jewry with Satan and antichrist (Eckart, p. 56).

 

An individual wrote me about this, and he asked me how God could have been killed. I ask him now: Where was God when the ethnic Ukrainians and Russians were being starved to their deaths and driven into the ground by Jewish reapers? Where was God when the AmerIndians were being murdered, raped and tortured by Europeans and Jews? Where was God when African slaves were being beaten, whipped, and enslaved for greedy, inhuman Americans? Where was God when the Chinese were being systematically slaughtered by their own leader—as many as 70 million—during the numerous proletarian revolutions in China?

 

I answer you: God has always been there, that “still small voice” inside of you, urging you to do the right thing; urging you to take responsibility; urging you to bring up your fellow man, not tear him down and spit upon him. He has always been there. His people refuse to listen. Hitler listened.

 

God will use whoever will listen to Him and do His will. The only people in this world, who are collectively doing His will and who are actively seeking Him, are the Middle Easterners. Yes, they do have their own unique approach to the Almighty—via Muhammed—but we all worship the same God; the God of mankind. Only Jewry worships Satan, the Destroyer of mankind; completely by choice. The Muslims are now God’s people because we elected with our own hearts and minds to refuse God’s promises, and instead, to partake of the Luciferian dream. Lucifer’s dream is very quickly revolving into a nightmare. You will someday see, but it may be too late, as in the cases of all the peoples that Jewry has massacred throughout the ages. The only racist and genocidal maniacs who drink human blood are Jews. Any questions? I didn't think so.

 

It amazes me at the number of brilliant people who cannot make sense of the Bible. They literally turn off their brain while they read it. It stuns me. Julius Streicher—God Bless him for all eternity—really and truly understood the Bible and Jesus. His writings are uncanny. I know why the Jews murdered him…because he wrote the truth, and the truth makes Jews seethe with anger and resentment because they hate themselves. How is anyone ever going to love others if they cannot even come to love themselves? The Jews are evil because they believe that they are a “chosen” people of God. God made all people, and loves all people, even the filthy, satanic Jews, but He reviles their pride just as He reviles Lucifer’s pride. Jews are the incarnation of Lucifer and the Gentiles are the incarnation of God. Jesus is, so far as I can tell, the Word and Message of God—the incarnation of God’s will for mankind. Though, He alone remains the Christian God of the West.

 

God will, again, exact His wrath through His current followers, but not of His own accord. That’s what Jews worry about, and they should, as they know that what they’re doing is satanic and malevolent. They know it. That’s why they seek complete and utter control, in order to suppress and murder. It happens every time. But, Jewry will lose, over and over again, because they follow the Loser of the world. The Jews may have their little piles of money and women, but they’re losers—spiritually, morally, and ethically. They are also nothing but hate-filled murderers. Money and goodies cannot buy the love of others, and that is why everyone has always, and ever, reviled them.

 

Hitler: On Politics and Slavs

 

“Then we have the Center Party: those people who have kept the servile slave mentality inculcated during the period that lasted from Roman military despotism to Ultramontane papal dominance. Precisely as the German Nationals allow us to recognize the Germanic will to rule and the spirit of Protestantism against dogmatization of faith and the stifling of conscience, so we see here those people and tribes that were gradually trained in passive obedience to authority under Sudanese and other legions. These same people automatically obeyed the cardinal’s of bishop’s miter worn by a papal legate, replacing the war helmet of the centurion. The limes is the geographic border of the Center Party’s power. Such true warriors as might have survived in this region were killed or banished from the land for inquisitions and witch burnings. This party is not, therefore, a group of proud German men with political convictions and intellectual orientation. Rather, it is a large, subservient herd of Rome’s sheepfold—grown un-free by virtue of its history” (Wag, p. 210).

 

Clearly, we see that Hitler does not let the Roman war-mongers off the hook, as he indicts them for their “despotism.” Despots rule over their people with tyrannical and absolute force. Hitler was never a despot, as he ruled with reason and Christ-inspired humanity. This is not to say that every Nazi-Sozi acted and thought as Hitler had—indeed, there were more than enough rotten minds, cruel hearts, and power-hungry fools to go round. Plus, there were the animal-like personalities of despotic, selfish, and foolish would-be rulers like Himmler, Bormann, and Goering, among others. Hitler did a pretty good job keeping these people in check, especially in light of his inability to rule with precision. Hitler was really not all that great at ruling per se, as he was much more prone to espousing his ideologies and goals, allowing others to actually implement them. In other words, Hitler was not very pragmatic, whereas Bormann excelled in this area, as he was above all else an uncanny bureaucrat. Hitler did not like to trouble himself with details, and this really exhibits itself in Hitler’s non-interest within the economic sphere, as he had always left the details of Nazi economic pragmatism in the hands of individuals like Wagener; but, what he failed to realize is that it may well have been that the details mattered most.

 

Notice also that Hitler challenges the “dogmatization” of the true Protestant-Christian spirit of the German. The direction that the churches had overwhelmingly taken was a dangerous one, and their collective idol worship and oppression of the people was not committed in the true Christian spirit. There is no way that Jesus would have approved of the burning of women and young girls at the stake. Jesus had also reviled materialism and idol worship, as He had taught His followers that there was much more to human life than material gain and possessions.

 

“Can you see the racial problem among the parties, Wagener? I can’t explicate it any other way, I can’t prove it either, I can only see it. But I see it as clearly as I see you standing there! Are you following me? You must, or you will not be able to regulate matters in Saxony” (p. 211).

 

Here again we see that Hitler, the artistic ideologue and inspirationist, has given his subordinate the general instructions for Saxony. It was entirely up to Wagener, as a responsible human being, to implement Hitler’s ideology in a fair and just way. Hitler’s inattention to details oftentimes allowed for a too-flexible continuum of interpretation. Bormann took advantage of this, no doubt, as had Himmler. Himmler had even had the audacity to begin secret negotiations with Americans and Jews behind Hitler’s back. Furthermore, Hitler’s vagueness was, in all probability, the reason as to why the euthanasia ‘mercy killing’ program got out of hand. Hitler scrapped the entire program due to the abuses that were going on.

 

“I can follow your every word. Please continue,” I said.

 

“Now I come to the Democrats. Once more, a racial stratum: the Jews and the artificial Jews. For every single Democrat of this party orientation is actually nothing but an artificial Jew. Hitler believed that the few Jews within the ranks of the German Democratic Party had so dominated it, that it had ultimately come to espouse a Jewish ethos. This would be equitable to the Democratic Party in the U.S., which supports Israel and Jewish policies at the expense of the American people—of many different religions and ethnicities. Hitler appears to have believed that Gentiles could be overthrown by the Jewish ethos, but that they were mostly liberal and reactionary Gentiles.

 

“This party, which has absolutely no right to be called ‘democratic,’ has international connections and international interests [just as the two American parties of today—the Dems and GOP]. It exploits the label of democracy to conceal the lack of any national idea. The concept ‘Volk’ is something these people despise, something they consider either petty bourgeois or chauvinist, even militaristic. All these three characteristics are attacked and contemptuously rejected by the Democratic Party. And yet, they are only slogans they themselves have invented for whatever they, in their spiritual and moral decay, lack and therefore attack. They speak of themselves as Europeans and cosmopolitans, they claim Goethe for themselves. Actually, they seem to me nothing more than a stinking abscess within the Volk, living off the work and diligence of the Volk, as it were. They exploit for their own aims and ends the achievements of the Volk in every sphere” (Wag, p. 211).

 

If we could just pluck Hitler from the sands of time and place him in front of a crowd of Americans, in a different body of course, so that we would not know who he was, he would undoubtedly still rally millions. This conversation directly applies to the socio-political currents in modern America, as our Democratic party is guilty of these very same crimes. In fact, both of the American parties have offered up their unconditional support of the illegal Jewish nation of Israel, which rightfully ought to be named Palestine. The Jewish politicians, political analysts—especially Krauthammer and Kristol— and academics have all rallied to the war drums of Jewish-Israel. But, what about the American people? Well, the Jews have exploited this successful and generous people, with its Western-Christian universalistic approach to humanity, for their own gain. These Jews have ultimately led America down the path to its own downfall, just as they had Russia and Weimar Germany. China, be careful…you’re next.

 

The most sickening observation I have come to realize is that the Jews have completely and utterly abandoned America’s domestic policies in favor of free oil for Israel and Halli-Satan’s development contracts in Iraq—all at our expense. Iraq doesn’t want Coca-Cola, so Jewry has to send our young people to go force them to consume it. You know why? Because that is what democracy is all about. Consumption and secular-humanism. “Here, drink some Coke and go gamble-away your entire month’s earnings, my fellow Iraqi.” The Jews are breaking us all. Ahmad needs the support of Americans more than ever. Arians and Arabs are not enemies. The Jews are trying to get us to hate one another, but I will not go for it. I cannot possibly hate anyone who is just trying to live their life peaceably. We have brought hell upon the Middle East, so now we have to deal with the consequences, regrettably. Anyway, instead of spending our money cleaning up Louisiana for our impoverished and decimated Black communities, we continue to waste all of our money on an illegal bloodbath, in both Afghanistan and Iraq. One of my relatives recently visited New Orleans, and she was absolutely devastated by what she observed. She said that it was like visiting a Third World nation. That is not acceptable…not in my America. We really need to start reclaiming our country from these Jewish war-mongering maniacs before it’s too late.

 

Hitler said, “Thank God the overwhelming mass of the German Volk has a finely attuned sense for who counts himself among the Volk and who distances himself from it. That is why this party [the Democratic Party] has no support whatever among the people. It has such support only outside the Volk” (Wag, p. 211). This appears to be the case in America today, as I still believe that the majority of us our good, quality, wholesome people. Though many of us may be ignorant, we are still a well-meaning people.

 

“And now, lastly, I come to the Communists. Their members, too, are in large part simply deluded” (Wag, p. 213). Hitler never held an overtly vindictive view of Russian and German Communists; only Jewish Bolsheviks who had exploited the Communists for their own gains. Hitler had come to understand that the Communists were well-meaning people who had not been collectively acute, or intelligent enough to realize that they were being used by Jewry. Indeed, the Russian Communists learned a long, hard, and bloody lesson because of their naiveté and ingenuous nature. I do not want to say that the Russians were dull, as they produced too many geniuses and brilliant minds to count; rather, I would say that they were not able to collectively detect the true nature of Jewry. Hitler had very much felt this way about the Russians (Wag, pp. 168-169; 202). He had lamented, “The international element of the communist movement that emanates from Russia is not really Russian, or Slavic; it is Jewish. And we must not make the mistake of believing that it is supported by a Russian-Slavic idea, which might even have some creative content. The current activities of the Comintern members are purely destructive” (Wag, p. 169). Hitler had believed that the Slavs would at first have to be “governed with the whip,” but, given time, would ultimately obtain their sovereignty once order and civility had triumphed. Yes, it is a little bit harsh-sounding, but he did not want to kill them, he just wanted to give them stern and absolute guidance during the German occupation-transitional stage. The Germans would not have continued to occupy all of the Slavic nations, as Hitler had said, “…the time is ripe for the totality of nations—that is, all the peoples and states—to give up fighting each other for power and supremacy, enslavement and exploitation, according to liberal principles. Then, even among them [Slavs] the time has come for giving pride of place [preference] to consideration, communal spirit, even ‘socialism.’ What first occurred on a small scale within the individual nations [of Europe] will then take place among the world-wide community of nations. Even the smallest of them will enjoy equal rights, even the have-nots [Africa, many nations of South America, etc.] will be able to share in the goods and the surplus of the elite’s international property. That is socialism of the nations!  But it is quite different from the international socialism of a Marx or a Lenin” (Wag, p. 169)!

 

Hitler as Dreamer

 

Hitler had indeed been very naïve with regards to human nature, but more revealingly, he had been one of those “dreamer” types. He could conceive of such a beautiful and Godly world, but it was regrettably an impossible goal in light of the malevolent and murderous will of Jewry. Hitler was not a warring man, nor was he a destructive man; he was a dreamer and creator, and many of his followers failed to understand or share his creative, beautiful, and peaceful dream for Europe, and later, the world. Many of his men had still clung to the materialism of Judaism, or the heinously racist ideologies of wicked hearts and minds. Many of his men became his ideological and military enemies. One of these men was Bormann. Another was Stauffenberg. But, as Wagener had lamented, Hitler was not able to read the malevolent nature of individual men and women around him. He had entwined Christ’s doctrine into his personal worldview, so he saw only the goodness, creativity, beauty, and selfless elements in others. Hitler had even commented, “If they [his ideas] are correct and can be translated into action, then no one needs to know about them until we begin to put them into effect. If they turn out to be incorrect or unworkable, then their becoming known could inflict endless damage on us. For in that case, our goals would be called utopian, and we ourselves, dreamers” (Wag, p. 96). So, Hitler wanted an actual ‘literal’ realization of his dreams and goals.

 

It would not be too farfetched to conclude that Hitler had truly applied Christ’s doctrine of “loving your enemy” when he came up against England. He did love that enemy, and he had repeatedly refused to attack and make war upon it. Regrettably, it did not work, and England mass murdered millions upon millions of its own neighbors and enemies. So, while Hitler was attempting to “love his enemy” and “love his neighbor as himself” his people were being slaughtered by the millions. What happened? Well, when you’re up against a satanic mentality and will you have to lash out in defense. Even Christ did so when He came up against Jewry in the Temple. He had also given us the okay to “bring the Jews before Him, and slay them.” So, Hitler probably should have decimated England and had Skorzeny murder Churchill, but his good nature prevented him from doing so. The somewhat sad truth is that Hitler was not hard enough for war. In fact, so far as I know, he never shot a single person as a soldier in WWI. He wrote a poem entitled, “The Encounter,” whereupon he negotiated with, I believe, a French soldier to help a fallen comrade. The two parted ways wishing each other the best. I do believe that this poem was written about a real, genuine encounter he had had, but, that would have to be verified. Hitler did capture several PoWs, but he did not kill any of them. Again, this would have to verified, as I am only recalling what I had read quite some time ago.

 

Hitler: On Jewry as the Only Parasitic Folkdom

 

Hitler told Wagener (1985):

 

“Look here, I have nothing against the Jews as such, no more than did Luther or Queen Elizabeth of England, or whoever else was a genuine anti-Semite. It’s a fact that the Jews exist in the world, and the Divine Creator allowed their mothers to bear children as well.

 

“What, then, is the true nature of the peculiarly isolated life the Jews live? For they do live a peculiar life. They do not, like other nations, live within the clear borders of one country; rather, they live within other nations—alien plants, as it were, among other plants.

 

“That fact, too, would not in itself be cause for objection. On the contrary. A variety of plants utilizes the soil much better, it livens up the picture, it increases the harvest.

 

“We can make the same comparison with the animal kingdom. Why shouldn’t goats be raised alongside of cows, foals and calves graze alongside each other, deer and rabbits and foxes live in the same woodland preserve? What kind of park would it be in which there were only nightingales or only thrushes? Diversity and variety are the strength and at the same time the beauty of nature.

 

“Among these animals, as among the plants, those that are stronger, healthier, more capable of life prevail in the struggle for existence. In the course of this effort, it does, of course, happen that one devours another or, among the plants, is choked.

 

“Now, in the animal world as in the plant world, there are also creatures we call parasites. It is characteristic of parasites that they do not use the same personal strength as do others to take their nourishment, their vital force, straight from the soil or from nature or, as the occasion arises, simply to kill other creatures in the process; instead, they strive to make use of the work of others in order to live as well and as effortlessly as possible. Take mistletoe or orchids—they do not live from the soil into which they laboriously drive roots to dig out their nourishment and drive it upward; rather, they clamp their talons somewhere into the bark of a tree, where there is a wound into which they can settle; they drive their suckers way down beneath the bark to divert to themselves the host tree’s vital fluids, so they can live on them themselves. They are sadists, bloodsuckers, devils. And the tree works and digs deep into the soil to draw up nourishment and blood for itself—for itself and for its lodger, who sucks and demands and who sits below the uppermost branches, so that the crown of the tree suffers unless the tree can work that much harder.

 

“These parasites have a special sense that allows them to detect where easier and better nourishment may be found. Look at ivy, a plant that begins by living on its own roots but then also becomes a parasite. It creeps up the side of a building or a rock. There you will soon see one strand branching off and trailing away to some other site. If you follow it, you discover a moldy spot, or a moist crevice. And that is where the ivy lets down new suckers and uses that starting place to develop with new and rampant driving force. How could the ivy know ahead of time that up above and to one side there would be a new and more favorable source of nourishment? That precisely is the parasitic instinct, which plants that are not parasitic do not have. A special talent! A sixth sense! A business sense, though of a sadistic origin, but an advantage to the parasitic creatures.

 

“Once one parasite has settled on a tree, others soon follow. They sit arrogantly enthroned on the host tree and proliferate, while it works and groans because it must feed its guests before anything is left over for its own flowering!

 

“And soon the tortured tree becomes stunted here and there. It can no longer manage it all. Now the parasitic trash really begins to fall on the moribund parts, which can no longer offer resistance; the parasite is no longer content with the host’s vital fluids alone but devours it altogether. In the process, the veins of the parasite release a mysterious poison into the body of the victim. This venom has a degenerating effect, gradually making the host grow sick and languish, increasingly weakening its power of resistance.

 

“When you see such ruined trees standing in old parks, everywhere overgrown with ivy and other climbing plants, only the trunk and bare branches showing through, while the parasites hang on them in dense, blossom-laden clusters, then you see what happens to a once proud oak when it becomes unable to withstand the parasites, unless some gardener frees it in time from the dangerous intruders.

 

“Even when the rotting trunk collapses and falls to the ground after one or two centuries, these sadists churn up even the last remnant of the cadaver. But at the same time, creeping along the ground, they begin to proliferate in the direction of new victims intended to donate another century to their lives.

 

“Such a parasitic genius—among mankind—is Jewry.

 

“In some way it comes among a people, first individually, then severally, as Moses described it in the case of Joseph, who summoned first his father and his brothers, then the clan, and finally the whole nation of Israelites into Egypt. We ourselves can observe the process constantly, as one man draws another after him across the eastern border.

 

“Then they settle wherever they find a soft spot, especially in commerce. It is rare for a Jew to become a factory worker, even less an agricultural laborer. He is not willing to earn his daily bread by the sweat of his brow. Even in commerce he does not burden himself with perishable goods. For they involve a risk, and he would have to hawk the goods, he would have to work so that they would not remain in stock and perish, representing a loss to him. Rather, he deals in living cattle, which nourishes itself; in horses; in grain, which represents the work of others; in cloth; in garments. And he attracts people with advertising and with display windows, so that they will come to him and deliver to him a portion of the results of their work. Or he lends money and demands interest—thus, once again, sharing in the vital fluids the work of others has produced and promoted.

 

“They take root everywhere. When wholesome national sentiment resists, they infuse a degenerating poison, a fiendish poison, into the nation; they speak of individualism, of universal human rights, of loyalty and good faith, or democracy! In reality, these are only the corrosive drops of the same poison that is used by the vegetable parasites to paralyze their victims, to destroy their ability to resist, to infect their bodies with disease and rot.

 

“Then comes the final spurt, the grasp for positions in public life and the state, to quench once and for all the tree’s own will to live and to devour the still living corpse. With sadistic lust they burrow into and pervade the tormented victim, which, defenseless, surrenders to them, allowing itself slowly to be gnawed and sucked dry. By now sixty percent of all lawyers in Germany are Jews, more than thirty percent of the judges in some regions are of Jewish origin. They push their way into the highest positions in the police, in the government, so as to expropriate and possess the economic body of the Volk unconditionally and with ever greater impunity.

 

“But these Kutiskers and Barmats are deceived! The Rathenaus and Hirsches are mistaken! The tree has not yet been made to fall. Even Versailles was not able to break its will to live! The powers of order were still in place, gardeners were still at work who clearly saw the looming danger! And it is our task to stir up the German Volk, so that this will to live will never again be submerged and the will to resistance will remain alive to the end of all that is mortal!

 

“Nothing upsets Jewry more than a gardener who is intent on keeping his garden neat and healthy. Nothing is more inimical to Jewry than order! It needs the smell of decay, the stench of cadavers, weakness, lack of resistance, submission of the personal self, illness, degeneracy! And wherever it takes root, it continues the process of decomposition! It must! For only under those conditions can it lead its parasitic existence.

 

“It is not for nothing that time and again the Jews have been driven out of countries where they settled—from Babylonia, from Egypt, from Rome, from England, from the Rhineland, and elsewhere. In each of these a gardener was at work who was incorruptible and loved his people.

 

“But since Weimer, you can once again see an enormous acceleration in the proliferation, the taking root, the stripping of corpses. Truly, if something does not happen soon, it may be too late!

 

“You look to France, to England, to America, to Russia! What do I care about these nations and their people! Let them cast themselves as fodder before Jewry! Then it becomes all the more important to cleanse Germany and to strengthen it against the danger in its own land and against a repetition of it. For it will repeat itself, it will always return, as long as people live on this earth. And the last ones, God help us, who will proliferate even when the end of man has come—that will be, in spite of everything, the Jews, until they breathe the last of their miserable parasites’ lives on the piled cadavers of their victims.

 

“To postpone this point in time as far into the future as possible is our duty, our God-given mission—yes, it is the substance of Divine Creation altogether.

 

“With shameful cynicism the Jewish priests read from the Books of Moses the promise that it shall be given to the Jews by Jehovah to one day rule over all mankind: All peoples shall be subject to you, their kings shall serve you, their wealth, their work shall be thine!

 

“In vain the prophets warned against this vile blasphemy, in vain Christ called out to the Jews: ye are all brothers! They have succeeded within the Church of Rome in falsifying the high Christian teaching of the community ordained by God, and they have taken the name of Christ in vain for the restoration of the Mosaic teachings of the promise [sic]. Even Protestantism did not protest against this anti-Christian doctrine, but only against the crassest manifestations of Jewry’s battle of decay and destruction in the Catholic Church, which was directed against everyone who tried to resist the talons of parasitism.

 

“And the struggle which the world and those churches that falsely designate themselves Christian wage against National Socialism [Nazi-Soziism]—against us, who want only the fulfillment of Christ’s lifework—is nothing more than the continuation of the crime of the Inquisition and the burning of witches, by which the Jewish-Roman world exterminated whatever offered resistance to that shameful parasitism.”

 

“Hitler paused. He emptied his cup and paced the room. Muttering to himself, he said:

 

“That is the situation. And we must structure our attitude to Jewry according to that understanding.”

 

“I myself was deeply impressed by his presentation and did not know immediately what to say in return.”

 

“But the Jews are here, in the world, whether or not we deplore their vile, sadistic parasitism and their will to destroy and exterminate us. And they deplore us as well, because we resist them, and they call us militarists and barbarians because we are prepared to take up arms, if need be, to keep them at bay. They are eager to draw the fangs and pull out the claws of a lion or a tiger—no, of all the lions and tigers—so as to harness the animals’ strength for their own purposes. And they call it militarism and barbarism when the lions do not submit to this but lash out?

 

“It does no good merely to despise them and to mock their ‘Jewish fear,’ which arises from their naturally guilty consciences. The gardener must intervene, and he must do so soon—as soon as possible” (pp. 61-65)!

 

As a necessary anecdote, Iwan Kutisker was a corrupt and criminal Jewish businessman in Hitler’s day. According to Henry Ashby Turner, Jr, he was guilty of “misusing credits obtained from the Prussian State Bank for speculative purposes” (p. 64). The Barmat brothers, Henri and Julius, were found guilty of bribing state officials in 1928 (Ibid.). Emil Rathenau, the Jewish founder of AEG, as well as his son Walther, had mobilized raw materials for the German war effort during the Jewish bankers’ First World War. Walther was assassinated in 1922. Paul Hirsch was a Jewish Social Democrat who had regrettably become prime minister of Prussia “after the 1918 revolution” (Ibid.).

 

This monologue is extremely important, because it provides us the consolidated version of Hitler’s thinking on Jewry—in one extremely concise, focused, and impelling reflection. Hitler, probably more so than any other Nazi besides Julius Streicher, truly understood the destructive and satanic will of Jewry. Streicher approached the problem with much more biblically-endowed fanatical zeal, but, he too had accurately understood the brevity of the Jewish Problem, and the urgent necessity for resolving it.

 

It is evident in this passage that Hitler wanted to be the instigator of a last, and final, Jewish expatriation. The phrase, Final Solution, could just as easily have been coined, Final Diaspora.

 

References

 

 

Bouhler, P. (Ed.). (1942). Der großdeutsche Freiheitskampf. Reden Adolf Hitlers (Vol .3). Munich: Franz Eher.

 

Brockschmidt, D. (2005). David Brockschmidt: History Lessons from the Memory Hole—let them eat their own words. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/n248.htm.

 

Eckart, D. (1999). Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin: A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me. (W. Pierce, Trans.). West Virginia: National Vanguard Books. (Original work published 1923)

 

Hitler, A. (1999). Mein Kampf (Ralph Mannheim, Trans.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. (Original work published 1927)

 

Hitler, A. (1937). Reichstag Speech of January 30, 1937. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://hitler.org/speeches/01-30-37.html.

 

Irving, D. (2002). Hitler’s War. London: Focal Point Publications.

 

Wagener, O. (1985). Hitler—Memoirs of a Confidant (Henry Ashby Turner, Jr. Ed.). (Ruth Hein, Trans.). London: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1978)

 

Weckert, I. (n.d.). Ingrid Weckert: Crystal-Night 1938. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.ety.com/berlin/flashpnt.htm.