|
Hitler’s Thoughts on God, His Divine Mission, Christianity and Jesus
Israel and Jewry: The Abomination that Causes Desolation
Hitler said:
“…And the last ones, God help us, who will proliferate even when the end of man has come—that will be, in spite of everything, the Jews, until they breathe the last of their miserable parasites’ lives on the piled cadavers of their victims. To postpone this point in time as far into the future as possible is our duty, our God-given mission—yes, it is the substance of Divine Creation altogether. With shameful cynicism the Jewish priests read from the Books of Moses the promise that it shall be given to the Jews by Jehovah one day to rule over all mankind: All peoples shall be subject to you, their kings shall serve you, their wealth, their work shall be thine! In vain the prophets warned against this vile blasphemy, in vain Christ called out to the Jews: ye are all brothers! They have even succeeded in the Church of Rome in falsifying this high Christian teaching of the community ordained by God, and they have taken the name of Christ in vain for the restoration of the Mosaic teachings of the promise. Even Protestantism did not protest against this anti-Christian doctrine, but only against the crassest manifestations of Jewry’s battle of decay and destruction in the Catholic Church, which was directed against everyone who tried to resist the talons of parasitism. And the struggle which the world and those churches that falsely designate themselves Christian wage against National Socialism—against us, who want only the fulfillment of Christ’s lifework—is nothing more than the continuation of the crime of the Inquisition and the burning of witches, by which the Jewish-Roman world exterminated whatever offered resistance to that shameful parasitism” (Wagener, pp. 64-65).
“Arab Palestinian Christians and Arab Palestinian Muslims lived side by side for the past 1400 years, and for anybody to say that the Arab Palestinian Christians have been persecuted recently by Muslims is absolutely another big lie, like the big lie that spoke of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.” - Riah Abu El-Assal, Christian Bishop of Jerusalem
“We Jews are in a state of panic, given the fact that dead Jews are precious and deserve a special burial. The fact that 5-10 Jews might be lost forever among some 125,000 gentiles is pretty horrifying, as I am sure you can see.” - Comments of an Israeli worker sent to Indonesia following the tsunami in late 2004 to prevent the bodies of dead Jews from being defiled by being buried in mass graves with non-Jews.
“So when you see standing in the Holy Place the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel, let the reader understand…for then there will be great distress unequaled from the beginning of the world until now, and never to be equaled again.”
These were the words spoken by Jesus of Nazareth, who spent 3 years of His life warring against the leaders of what was at that time the Jewish agenda. When asked by His followers what the signs would be that would usher in the final battle between good and evil, He warned of the ‘abomination of desolation’ sitting in the ‘holy place.’ What could be more of an abomination than this creature known as the state of Israel, and all the evil it has caused since its inception a century ago? What could be more of an affront to the goodness of God than that the evil, inhuman and vicious ideology, known as Judaism, [took] root in the land that was made holy by the life, death and resurrection of this innocent man named Jesus of Nazareth?
Every day, innocent men, women and children in places such as Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan must pay the ultimate sacrifice in continuing this battle that was begun by this man named Jesus of Nazareth, and yet, short of a few souls who are awake to this reality, the Christian world continues on in its slumber and in its slavish obedience to the Devil himself in giving the Pharisees of today everything that they demand (Crescent and Cross, 2006).
Third Reich Christianity Re-Cap: Public and Private Proclamations
According to Ernst Helmreich (1980), during Hitler’s first radio address after coming into power in 1933, he had stated the following: “The national government…will defend and maintain the foundations on which the power of our nation rests. It will offer strong protection to Christianity as the basis of our collective morality” (p. 128).
As Steigmann-Gall (2003) has noted, the “ ‘school policy statement of the NSDAP,’ “… insisted that ‘the German school shall be the Christian community school…Education should not offer dead knowledge, but should impart those things that mould the soul and character of young people. The living sources are the German Volkstum, the German Heimat and the eternally living antecedents of the German people. The basic premise of education is active Christianity’” (p. 77). And, as a matter of fact, when Heinrich Hoffmann (1955), Hitler’s photographer and close friend, had asked Hitler what kind of school he ought to commit his son to, Hitler had matter-of-factly stated, “I strongly recommend you send him to a convent school” (p. 132).
Hoffmann, Bormann, and Helmreich Discuss Hitler’s Christianity
Hitler told Bormann:
Jesus was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him themselves. It is quite probable that a large number of the descendants of the Roman legionaries, mostly Gauls, were living in Galilee, and Jesus was probably one of them. His mother may well have been a Jewess [as stated in the Jewish Talmud, which claims Jesus was the “son of a whore and a Roman soldier.”]
Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and, therefore, against the Jews.
Paul of Tarsus, who was originally one of the most stubborn enemies of the Christians, suddenly realized the immense possibilities of using, intelligently and for other ends, an idea which was exercising such great powers of fascination. He realized that the judicious exploitation of this idea among the non-Jews would give him far greater power in the world than would the promise of material profit to the Jews themselves. It was then that the future St. Paul distorted with diabolical cunning the Christian idea. Out of this idea, which was a declaration of war on the golden calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews, he created a rallying point for slaves of all kinds against the elite, the masters and those in dominant authority. The religion fabricated by Paul of Tarsus, which was later called Christianity, is nothing but the Communism of today (Bormann, pp. 721-722).
Hoffmann (1955) had said, “Hitler firmly believed that he had been chosen by Fate to lead the German people to hitherto undreamed of heights; and his rise to power, the great success he achieved immediately after his assumption of power only strengthened this belief, not only in Hitler himself, but also in his adherents.” He continued on, “When in his speeches he referred to Providence, he did not do so simply to achieve rhetorical effect; he really believed what he said, and this conviction could not but be strengthened by the truly miraculous manner in which he was again and again preserved” (p. 134).
Hitler paid visits to churches quite often, and this has been documented by Otto Dietrich (The Hitler I Knew), as well as Heinrich Hoffmann. Hoffmann (1955) had recollected a few particular visits in his memoirs. One such visit was photographed by Hoffmann, and it resulted in the photo of Hitler with the cross right above his head. When Hoffmann showed the photo to Hitler, Hess had demanded that it be withdrawn, but Hitler had said, “That I visited the church is a fact. What my thoughts were, you could not photograph, and it wasn’t you who put up the cross which happens to be just above my head in the snap. Leave it just as it is, Hoffmann—if the people think I’m a devout man, well, no harm will come of that” (p. 134)! Mr. Fritz Berg made a very simple, yet very profound statement to me upon glimpsing at this photo, and it is powerful enough to reiterate here. I had discussed with him that this photo is, indeed, very important; but, it does not necessarily suffice as a fool-proof piece of evidence confirming Hitler’s affirmation or support of the Christian churches in Natsi Germany. He asked me, rhetorically [though, this isn’t verbatim], “Well, that may well be true, but, is there even one photo of Josef Stalin coming out of church, or visiting a church?” That, to me, is a very powerful and extremely pertinent point, in and of itself. The answer is, “No, there isn’t.” There isn’t a single picture of Lenin or Marx visiting a church either. In fact, the satanic blood-Jew, Vlad Lenin, had said of religion: “Religion is a kind of spiritual gin in which the slaves of capital drown their human shape and their claims to any decent life” (RevisionNotes.co.uk, n.d.). The lying, satanic Jewish beast, Karl Marx, said, “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people” (Youth for International Socialism, n.d.). Furthermore, these two racist, God-hating murderers had also espoused the following ideas about religion: “Religion dulls the pain caused by oppression. It does nothing to solve the problem; it is a bad attempt to make life more bearable. 1. Salvation from bondage and misery by promised after-life 2. Promises people will be rewarded for their virtue 3. Offers hope of supernatural intervention to solve problems on earth 4. Often justifies social order and a person’s place within it
Helps people at the bottom accept their situation” (RevisionNotes.co.uk, n.d.). One will never come across anything even remotely akin to this blasphemy; especially not from Adolf Hitler—in fact, not even from his pagan followers—like Himmler, Rosenberg or Darré—or, for that matter, from Martin Bormann. So, Mr. Berg is correct; photos, no matter how insignificant they may seem, are actually very important pieces of evidence. The fact of the matter is the Jews were, and remain, the only atheists and true opponents of God. They hate God and they revile His followers. Their so-called Yahweh is Antichrist. There is no other interpretation. Hoffmann (1955) had recollected Hitler’s visitations with a couple of prominent cardinals. He recalled that, “Cardinal Faulhaber appealed to Hitler [with regards to the anti-church book Bormann had published and distributed en masse] and was invited to lunch at Obersalzberg. In their ensuing conversation, the Archbishop of Munich petitioned Hitler to order the suppression of this very questionable work. His arguments convinced the Fuehrer, who at once ordered Bormann to destroy all copies” (p. 131). Hoffmann had gone on to indicate that “when relating the details of this interview to a few of us in his own intimate circle, [he] displayed a moderation towards Church affairs…” (p. 131).
Hitler had even said, “I would release any priest,…provided he were willing to sign an undertaking not in future to interfere in politics, but to restrict himself to his spiritual duties. But this they refuse to do—a proof, to my mind, that they attach greater importance to political affairs than to things spiritual. If these gentlemen are determined to play the martyr—so be it” (Hoffmann, p. 132)!
According to Hoffmann (1955), Hitler would comb the prophecies line-by-line interjecting himself or Germany into the projected scenarios (p. 136). He did not think that all of the prophecies had direct bearing on himself, but “he did feel that they constituted an inexplicable phenomenon; and in this connection, he quoted Hamlet: ‘There are more things in Heaven and earth…’ (p. 137).
Helmreich (1980) had stated, that on 4 February 1933, “a desecration or defamation of religious institutions was threatened with civil punishment; at the end of the month steps were taken in Prussia to abolish the 295 secular schools in which religion was not taught, and religion was again made a regular subject of instruction at vocational and continuation schools.” Furthermore, “Such measures were welcome to church people, who contrasted them with the decrees against religion in the schools enacted in the first [Jewish-Bolshevist] revolutionary days of 1918. …The religious formula was again made part of the oath, and the phrase Gott mit Uns was restored to the official seal of Prussia. Laws and ordinances designed to safeguard Sundays were issued repeatedly” (p. 129).
Helmreich had also stated, “In order to strengthen his cause in the March, 1933, election, Hitler had the idea of proposing that the government proclaim a day of prayer for ‘folk and fatherland.’ He asked Secretary Hans Heinrich Lammers, head of the Reich Chancellery, to consult with Minister of the Interior Wilhelm Frick about the proposal” (p. 129). This national prayer day had solely been Hitler’s conception; unfortunately, the pettiness of the churches stood in the way of Hitler’s prayer day becoming a reality for his people.
And, in a speech at Stuttgart, 16 February 1933, Hitler had confirmed his position in support of the Christian religion. He said, “Today Christians and no international atheists stand at the head of Germany. I speak not just of Christianity; no, I also pledge that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity….We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit, not just theoretically. No, we want to burn out the rotten developments in literature [which the Nazi-Sozis literally did during the “notorious” public book-burning ceremony] in the theater, in the press—in short, burn out this poison which has entered into our whole life and culture during these past fourteen years [under Weimar Jewish rule]” (Helmreich, pp. 128-129).
In 1933, Reverend Charles S. Macfarland, the general secretary of the Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America, wrote:
The fact of the matter is Adolf Hitler is the conservative and restraining personal force in Germany today (in contrast to such leaders as Göring and Göbbels). One can discover many indications of that influence to some extent in his speeches, but still more in his counsels and guidance. And now, even if he may be charged with having laid hands on the church, it is quite possible that he may become its protector from his own original mistaken measures and more particularly those of his overzealous and somewhat delirious followers in the Church.
If the present ground is held, the Church may not only free itself from National Socialism, but also from the state and may do it largely with the help of Adolf Hitler (Helmreich, p. 149).
Interestingly enough, Himmler had gone so far as to actually forbid “…every attack on Christ as a person, as such attacks, or denunciation of Christ as a Jew, was unworthy of the SS…” (Helmreich, pp. 217-218). So, even though many of the Nazi-Sozis denounced the churches or members of the clergy, not one of them—not even Rosenberg or Bormann—had ever denounced the person or historical role of Jesus Christ, no matter their religious views.
Hitler had made the following faith-based proclamation, which was to be shared with bishops, but “treated confidentially” otherwise. He said:
Secular schools can never be tolerated because such a school has no religious instruction and a general moral instruction without a religious foundation is built on air; consequently, all character training and religion must be derived from faith. From our point of view as representatives of the state, we need believing people. A dark cloud threatens from Poland. We have need of soldiers, believing soldiers. Believing soldiers are the most valuable ones. They give their all. Therefore we will maintain the confessional schools in order to train believing people through the schools, but this depends upon having truly believing teachers, not by chance Marxists who do not stand fully by their religious faith, as teachers (Helmreich, p. 241). There can be little doubt that this was one reason as to why many of the Jewish teachers in Nazi Germany were fired.
Lastly, according to Helmreich (1980), “Hitler did not have a high opinion of the Nordic groups and never lent them his personal support” (p. 408). So, the idea that Hitler was a Nordic-pagan, or had based his Party’s religious ideologies on a Nordic-pagan precept, is completely unfounded.
The Recollections of Speer and Eckart
Hitler had told Eckart:
“Possibly—but I cannot help thinking that man has been endowed with a brain which he is intended to make use of, and that anything which is founded on a premise unacceptable to the human intellect cannot endure forever. It is not possible to hold fast for very long to tenets which the progress of knowledge have proved to be false. … In my eyes the ability of mankind to reject a proven untruth is one of its virtues. … It adds little to our knowledge of the Creator when some parson presents to us an indifferent copy of a man as his conception of the Deity. In this respect, at least, Mohammedan is more enlightened, when he says: to form a conception of Allah is not vouchsafed to man.
The most pressing danger, as I see it, is that Christianity, by adhering to a conception of the Beyond which is constantly exposed to the attacks of unceasing progress, and by binding it so closely to many of the trivialities of life which may at any moment collapse, is ripening mankind for conversion to materialistic Bolshevism. And that is a terrible tragedy. Man will lose all sense of proportion, and once he considers himself to be the lord of the universe, it will be the end of everything. And if the Church in Spain continues in the way it is doing, it will end up on the refuse-heap. … The Church of today is nothing more than a hereditary joint-stock company for the exploitation of human stupidity” (pp. 606-607).
The truth… is indeed, as you once wrote: one can only understand the Jew when one knows what his ultimate goal is. And that goal is, beyond world domination, the annihilation of the world. He must subjugate all the rest of mankind, he persuades himself, in order to prepare a paradise on earth. He has made himself believe that only he is capable of this great task, and, considering his ideas of paradise, that is certainly so. But already in the means that he employs, one sees that he is secretly driven to something else. While he pretends to be elevating mankind, he torments men to despair, to madness, to ruin. If he is not stopped, he will destroy all men. His nature compels him to that goal, even though he dimly realizes that he will thereby destroy himself. There is no other way for him; he must act thus. This realization of the unconditional dependence of his own existence upon that of his victims appears to me to be the main cause of his hatred. To be obliged to try to annihilate us with all his might, but at the same time to sense that that must lead inevitable to his own ruin, therein lies the crux of the matter. If you will: the tragedy of Lucifer (pp. 72-73).
Speer (1971) quoted Hitler as saying: “I’d be glad to give him my full support. Think of all he could do with that. Through me the Evangelical [Protestant] Church could become the established church, as in England” (pp. 141-142).
Speer had also noted, “Around 1937, when Hitler heard that at the instigation of the party and the SS vast numbers of his followers had left the church because it was obstinately opposing his plans, he nevertheless ordered his chief associates, above all Goering and Goebbels, to remain members of the church. He too would remain a member of the Catholic Church, he said, although he had no real attachment [affinity for] to it. And in fact he remained in the church until his suicide” (p. 142).
Public Proclamations as Recorded by McClatchie and Baynes
American reporter Stanley McClatchie (2001) had stated, “In any case, the world is becoming more socialistic, and it is merely a question of whether the socializing process will involve bloody class struggles, the decimating of the “bourgeoisie,” or whether it will proceed quietly and peacefully in the manner of national socializing, based upon social development and the foundation of national and Christian tradition” (p. 6). He went on to observe that, in Hitler’s Germany, “Religion grows from the spirit of piety, and the creative forces responsible for the New Reich are deeply religious in nature. All religion looks upward to the white radiance of eternity and the highest architectural expression of this striving is the Gothic dome. …Through the means of modern science, however, the newly awakened Germany has fulfilled this primaeval dream of humanity in a superb manner….A gigantic dome formed of shafts of light suddenly penetrated the darkness, rising into endless space. No photograph could reproduce this overpowering impression; …During this consecrated moment when an endless dome rises above us we solemnly vow: ‘We believe in an Almighty God in Heaven who created us, watches over us and directs our actions, and who sent you, our Fuehrer, to free Germany…’” (p. 59).
Hitler had publicly proclaimed, “I say: My feelings as a Christian points me to the Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to a man, once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! Was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and a man I read through the passage which tells us how at last the Lord rose in his might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross” (Baynes, p. 32).
Hitler told Wagener (1985), “Perhaps the adherents of the Roman Church would call this ‘paganism.’ That may well be so. In that case, Christ was a pagan. I call pagan their distortions of Christ’s ideas and teachings, their cults, their conception of hell, purgatory, and heaven, and their worship of saints” (p. 224).
The Wagener Account: God, Christ, Hitler’s Mission, and Christianity
Hitler told Wagener (1985), “And there we are, in the middle. Sometimes I grow dizzy to think what it is we have set as our objective. But then, when I see such men as Dincklage and Hallermann—then it comes over me like a premonition: Such a powerful upheaval requires sacrifices, it demands sacrifices, and sacrifices must be brought. I see our goal and our mission so clearly that I would feel like a traitor to Divine Providence, to our Volk, such as Dincklage, were I to stumble. And besides: the hands of time’s clock cannot be turned back, world history and destiny march on. And all that is left is to beseech Providence to be merciful in the sacrifices it demands” (p. 17). The day after Hitler discussed this with Wagener, Major Dincklage died; Hallermann died a week later. Furthermore, it is clear from this statement that Hitler realized that his men had died for this, and he would not allow their deaths to be in vain. Hitler was determined to allow his destiny, guided by God, to run its course. He really had no other choice, as the Jews in Russia were not going to let Germany prosper. An apocalyptic cataclysm between these two worldviews—that is, between God’s Army and Satan’s Army—was inevitable.
Hitler gave Bormann and Wagener (1985) an historical lesson in the spread of the Christian religion in Europe. He said, “But this Christianity had a Roman stamp. It had already taken on fixed forms; it was already heavily dogmatized; and most especially, it was tailored to the ideas and feelings as well as the ethos of the people who can be designated by the name Mediterranean race. The people of the Greek geographic area, Byzantium, the entire Balkan peninsula, and as far as the Sea of Azov had already given a particular character to the Christian Church. For the people there had a different attitude toward things, both the things of this world and the transcendent. In the Orient the Christian Church could not establish any foothold at all, although it was conceived in Palestine. There, six hundred years later a Mohammed created a religious movement adapted to the Eastern soul. The Arabic peoples—but also the Semitic family of nations and all its descendents—did not desire self-responsibility toward God. Destiny, fated predestination, suited their nature more exactly. And their family life, too, was different, so that Christianity would not have suited them.
“In half a century the holy banner of the Prophet conquered for Islam all of Asia Minor down into India and then waged powerful campaigns along the coast of North Africa up to Spain, only to run out of steam when in its turn it came up against the entirely different nature of the Vandal-Gothic population layer in Sicily, as well as the Goths and Celts on the Iberian peninsula and in western France. A religion—and especially a church established by human dogma—cannot simply be forced on other people if they do not conform racially or doctrinally with the ethos that determines this church.
“And so it happened that the Germanic peoples and the tribes related to them could not declare themselves in agreement with certain views and practices of the Roman Church and soon began to protest against them. With merciless brutality the Church of Rome, supported by the nobles and kings who were dependent on it, tried to extirpate this heresy, and they did actually eradicate it among whole nations. In the name of the Inquisition, in Spain everyone was wiped out and tortured to death who, in accordance with the differing ways there, protested against the dogmas of Rome. And these were precisely and primarily the remnants of the old Germanic civilization that had been left behind in Spain, in Italy, in France and Belgium, and so forth—they comprised most of the leading families in those nations. In Germany this extermination was carried out in the name of the witch trials. Actual wars resulted, dreadful destruction, murder and arson, the combat of all against all. That epoch entered history as the time of the Wars of Reformation and the Thirty Years’ War. An English queen inspired by Heaven, Elizabeth, preserved England from these wars. But elsewhere, a united Germanic spirit under the great Swedish king, Gustavus Adolphus, intervened in the decisions and saved the lands and lives of all those whose more Germanic thoughts and feelings were not prepared to bow to the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church. Only those areas of Europe—aside from the Greek and Orthodox territories—that had lived for centuries under the authoritarian rule of Roman military despotism and had gradually lost their basically democratic Germanic independence remained faithful to Rome. The others, as Protestants, disengaged themselves from the Roman Church and created their own forms of Christianity.
“Where the Germanic breed predominates, the people are Protestants; where Romanism has left its mark, the people are Catholic. The Peace of Westphalia introduced certain revisions. Furthermore, especially in Germany, over time economic and dynastic impulses have produced a strong intermixture. But you see from this map how clearly the line of demarcation has been maintained to this day. The SA attracts the militant natures among the Germanic breed, the men who think democratically, unified only by a common allegiance. Those who throng to the SS are men inclined to the authoritarian state, who wish to serve and to obey, who respond less to an idea than to a man” (pp. 20-21).
“The execution of this great transformation must be left to the youth. And if the old should succeed in restraining us and hindering our work, then there is no help for them, then Bolshevism will descend on them—the Bolshevism which it is our sacred goal to save the world from. With brutal ruthlessness it will crush underfoot and stamp out everything their incompetent egotism attempts to defend. A Sodom and Gomorrah will rise, such as we have already seen in Russia! Only after decades of suffering will the new come into being and rise from the ruins of that collapsed ideology and world—the new of which we have a presentiment and which it is our hope to see more clearly. …Oh, I foresee the costly struggle to persuade the pigheaded and stubborn world, to break the power of this swindle perpetrated upon the working man, which has become law, and to awaken the conviction that it is just as easy to do things right! However, it is essential to jettison that which is old and traditional and no longer suited to the changing times” (Wagener, p. 45). “…The implications of these ideas is enormous. Wars have broken out, internal battles have been fought, revolutions have turned the world upside down, in order to solve the one and only major problem of our time: to replace the ‘rule of capital over labor, with the ‘rule of labor over capital’” (Ibid., p. 47)… “it must be the task of politics to prevent the leaping across to Germany and other nations of the world of Russian Bolshevism, that false and, in its own way, criminal solution of the problem, until we are in a position to sponsor the total program of a new social economy and to make a gift of it to our German Volk and to all mankind” (Ibid., p. 48).
“Such a change cannot be decreed by legislation! Nor can it be brought about by a ministry…Such a transformation requires an inner conversion! A mental, a spiritual, an ethical, even a religious one! Do you think your minister of labor is capable of that, or your minister of transportation, or the minister of justice, or even the minister of culture? Of course, they are necessary and must make an effort to work in the new spirit. And that is why I approve your plans and Strasser’s proposal. But all the officials you will encounter at some later time, all the regulations, the entire closely interwoven and entangled conditions of collaboration with other ministries and offices, and finally the pure mammoth strength of the factor of inertia—all these will paralyze you, will stall your work. Your honest and industrious ambitions will be frittered away in petty conflicts and in open and covert resistance, until you and your men are yourselves confused and lose heart and, prematurely gray, collapse in the face of deficient human insight and knowledge.
“…What is crucial is the internal conversion of the people, the Volksgenossen, of the Volk! And that is a political task! As yet, almost everyone is imprisoned in the liberalistic attitude. Do you think that a confirmed industrial entrepreneur is prepared suddenly to admit that his property is not a right but a duty? That capital should no longer rule but be ruled? That it is not the life of the individual that matters but the totality? …It is such a far-reaching and complete conversion that the adult is no longer capable of it. Only youth can be converted, newly aligned and adjusted to the socialist sense of obligation toward the community. For almost two thousand years the Gospel of Christ has been preached, for two thousand years the sense of community has been taught: love one another, care for one another, respect and help one another! But today, at the end of these two thousand years, economic liberalism flourishes as never before! During a world war lasting almost five years, the nations slaughtered one another, and in a sadistic delirium the victor tramples on the liberty and lives of the vanquished—while in their temples they pray, ‘Whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.’ The mendacity, the infamy, the hypocrisy of mankind have become a downright blasphemy!
“And in a couple of years we are supposed to make up for all this and to restore order where millennia have sinned? We’re to believe that we can restore the value of the word of God, the teaching of Christ, the truth of a holy religion, where generations upon generations, nations upon nations, the entire lifespan of a human cultural epoch, all were unable even to recognize the deep abyss in which they wandered or sojourned!
“True, this misinterpretation of the Christian faith has become clearly evident only recently, through the mechanization of manual labor and the industrialization of the economy, which allowed the condition of pre-Christian slavery to be revived in new forms. But where were the high priests, where were the scribes? They turned away, as they did that time in Jerusalem, from the plight of the people, and with a sanctimonious gesture they folded their hands and prayed, ‘We thank you, God, that we are not like them!’ And they drove the hungry and unemployed masses back into the dust of their despair.
“…when the cheerful hands of an innocent child reach for you, then you will sense the inner conversion; then you will realize that a new faith is awakening out of the lethargy of a corrupt epoch and taking to the march—the faith in divine justice, in heavenly truth; the faith in an unworldly, paradisiacal future, where the lust for power, force, and enmity gives way to equality and fraternity, the spirit of sacrifice, love and loyalty, and the will to stand before the throne of the Almighty with the open heart of one ready to believe in God. And they will have sufficient greatness to stammer out the prayer for their brothers and fathers, ‘Forgive them, Lord, for they knew not what they did.’
“It is on this basis alone that the new world can be built! To lay this groundwork is our task. Our own hopes can aim no further. We must leave some things to be done by those who will come after us. Your work will be a signpost for the future, a witness to our great intention, but in our time it will not be crowned with realization” (Ibid., pp. 56-57).
As evidenced in this monologue, Hitler believed that his task consisted only of thwarting satanic Jewish Bolshevism, in order to safeguard future generations, as well as leave the National Socialist message and its historical contributions behind for posterity. He knew that it would not come to pass in his lifetime, but he was uncanny enough to preserve—for posterity—the truth, so that someday his ‘Christ-socialistic’ worldview would be revived.
“…That is why we must always be so strong that we can strike down—or, better still, prevent—the Communist insurrection. Once the ruling power is in our grasp, we must seize the evil in Germany by the root and tear it out, to make way for true socialism, for the new faith, for the new religion…where the word democracy is derived, not from demos, the people, but from daemon, the devil: until then they will wage war against socialism; and where there is no other choice, they will drive their peoples and their youth to the slaughtering block for the sake of their economic power, for their money bags, for their mammon. And the [American and British] peoples will be stupid enough, and will be kept stupid enough, to go to war in the belief that they are fighting for their fatherland. But they are fighting only to maintain the domination of capital over labor and for the interest paid on that capital” (Ibid., pp. 58-59).
Americans and Britons died for Jewish money in both WWI and WWII; the first step toward healing is confronting one’s denial. To deny this harsh fact is to lie to oneself, thus, empowering Antichrist with control over one’s heart and mind. America is still dying for Jewry—in Afghanistan and Iraq.
…“But I cannot imagine that other nations would not realize that Bolshevism, and only Bolshevism, would profit from a military confrontation, and that there is a risk that instead of fulfillment of the sublime Christian idea of a socialist sense of community, which these nations wish to prevent—from selfish and un-Christian motives—the grotesque visage of rule by inferiors [read: Jews] will wave its diabolical scepter over humanity” (Ibid., p. 59). … “Fate works its own way with us. We are only its tools. Granted, not from lack of willpower. There is that kind, also. But we are not among them. It is precisely with our will that we are the tools of fate. But when we do want something that may not suit fate—or, to put it more precisely, Providence [God]—we run into resistance and do not attain our goal. It is a great talent to recognize such resistance and to come to the proper decision: either to overcome it by attack or to obey fate’s sign and step aside in order to search for another path” (Ibid., p. 61).
“Which is the more dangerous enemy—I mean the one that threatens us most immediately? Without a doubt it is Bolshevism—we can safely call it Jewish Bolshevism. For if it were not Jewish, it could be given a different format. In that case, we might even be able to come to terms with it at some later date. But we will never be able to come to terms with Jewish Bolshevism without signing our own death warrant” (Ibid., p. 71)… “The Jew has just as little liking for Nordics as is the case in reverse. Except that, as long as he does not have the power, the Jew is smart enough not to let his feelings show. But once he holds the power, he no longer makes a secret of his aversion, and his aversion can easily be intensified to the point of fanatical hatred and acts of sadism. At that point his attitude becomes evident to those who were not aware of it before” (Ibid., p. 83).
This is exactly what has happened in Palestine, what had happened in Russia—and in Europe during the Thirty Years’ War—and, what is going to happen in America. The Jews have already started the process of Bolshevization of America; it’s now only a matter of time until Americans are eating shoe leather and dogs. It is what will come to pass if we should fail.
“But after all, we mean to work, to build! We must expand our organization, structure it! Only a broadening of the party allows us the chance to grow into a position where we can carry out our most secret plans. Democracy demands the masses! Numbers make the difference. It will be our mission at some later time to ennoble parliamentary democracy—the most primitive of all ruling forms for a self-governing people—by giving the Volk a constitution that will enable the people to bring to the forefront the best, the most competent, the aristoi.
“That is why our first task is to woo the masses. What use are a hundred scholars to me, a thousand professors, what use are the so-called intelligentsia, who are not even intelligent enough to recognize the triviality of parliamentarianism?
“As for the British form—which, as I have come to realize, is also predominant in America and in all other democracies of the Western stamp—it exploits democracy only as a mock organization while, through the Masonic Lodge and other similar secret and public societies, or even directly, with money, it puts those names on the parties’ candidate lists that make up the equally secret executive committee, which in turn represents the actual power interests. I cannot reconcile myself to this form. For at heart it is nothing but a betrayal of the people. I do not want to betray the people. And in the long run, they cannot be betrayed, at least not the German Volk! For at bottom, the German Volk is truly democratic” (Ibid., p. 98). …“I don’t need a lodge, I don’t need any secret societies that pretend to the Volk that it is electing its men, while in reality they put their men on the lists and get them elected. I’d be ashamed of abusing the trust offered me by this Volk, which has been so severely downtrodden and betrayed, which looks to me with a last glimmer of hope. …That is why I must work to win over the masses” (Ibid.).
Wagener himself had stated, “Perhaps Christ was one of the first to contrast man’s liberalistic attitude with the socialist stance. But His teachings, which can still be found in pure and noble form in [Rabbi] St. Paul and others, soon became falsified, even turned upside down, and little of Christianity remains in the churches that use its name today.” Hitler replied, “I know that, Wagener. I’m quite clear on that point. But perhaps it is easier to preach and find prophets for a socialism that corresponds to Marxist ideas or present-day communism than for the synthesis of reason that has the goal of putting the given traits of humanity in the service of the people. …Communism results in a welfare state where the standards are averaged downward. We want a state that allows for free development of the personality, but in the last analysis, this must also be for the needs of the people—that is, in the service of the community, where the standard is to be raised as high as possible, and then higher yet” (Ibid., p. 115).
“…And that is why there need be no hypocrisy about 1866 and 1870! The peace treaties were true peace treaties, and the question of guilt did not arise.
“These are the Christians whom it is important to unmask, whom our youth must learn to recognize in order to grow strong for all time against the foreign [read: Jewish] lie and against the perfidy that conceals the poisoned dagger under a cloak studded with the emblems of the Christian churches. …To fill the Volk with the reborn faith and the Weltanschauung of Him who was once before a savior in the peoples’ deepest hour of need—that is primary! …It is youth that will once more conquer the true kingdom of heaven for its Volk and for all mankind” (Ibid., p. 141)!
Wagener (1985) had reflected, “Too frequently Hitler’s thinking along this line was misunderstood and rejected as un-Christian and pagan. Yet it is imbued with a deep, religious sense of responsibility, which is essential to a statesman or the creator of a new, socialist worldview…I do not remember even a single occasion when Hitler gave any instructions that ran counter to the true Christian spirit and to humaneness” (p. 147).
Hitler had proclaimed, “What Marxism, Leninism, and Stalinism failed to accomplish we shall be in a position to achieve. And our synthesis is not a compromise—I should reject any such thing—it is, instead, the radical removal of all the false results of industrialization and unrestrained economic liberalism, and the redirection of this line of development to the service of humanity and the individual” (Ibid., p. 149).
“…Thus, as it was explained to me and as I understood it, I owe to Einstein the scientific proof that there are things which, recognized by man’s senses, nevertheless cannot be understood and justified, though they are true and could form the basis for a new way of thinking, perhaps even of a new conception of the world.”
Hitler had lamented, “But I do not…receive such perceptions through the human senses at all! If it were that sort of perception, it would be amenable to logical proof. And if it were not, it would undoubtedly be false. Rather, in such cases I feel as if I were taking my perceptions from that superdimensional world that Einstein has looked into, not with his eyes or conscious mind, but with his mathematics.
“But do you always know whether such a perception comes from the beyond or through the agency of the human senses within this world?”
“I do know each time, without question. But I don’t always take that fully into account. That is also why sometimes I heedlessly pass over such transcendental inspirations. In general, at such moments I have a sensation like an inner vibration, as if I were being touched by an invisible charge. Whenever I have seized the impulse, what I have said or did as a result of that feeling always turned out to be correct. Whenever I have let it go, almost invariably it turned out later that it would have been right to follow the inner voice.”
“I believe,” I interrupted Hitler, “that you are not the only one to whom this happens. All human beings, more or less, have this faculty. Some say that they are having a good day or a lucid moment…”
“—and damnable logic intervenes!…and human reflection! And then one works up a view or an opinion that is marvelously proven or justified, and we let ourselves be influenced by others who lack any divine spark—and in the meantime, the chance passes and we hit our heads in exasperation and say, ‘If only you’d followed your first impulse’” (Ibid., p. 151)!
Wagener had replied, at one point, “So long as we are together, those of us who know each other, I have no fears. But whether strangers will be able to follow you, or even understand you—that is my great concern.”
Hitler unhesitatingly replied, “That is why you must keep strangers away from me” (Ibid., p. 153).
“…But Greek culture conquered and fertilized the entire Middle East, and around the most significant settlement, Alexandria, there developed the kingdom of the Ptolemies as the last great—yes, the most significant—rallying point of antique art and science, destined to pass on to posterity, and thus also to us, the enormous values and ideas of this culture. That is why today Alexander appears to us as God’s tool, destined to prevent the destruction of Greco-Egyptian culture by the savage Asiatic hordes which once before, under Xerxes, had penetrated to the Peloponnesus, and to break the tempestuous Persian power through an alliance, a marriage of the Greek spirit and Western civilization…Charles V’s intentions also differed from what actually happened, or Luther’s, or even Robespierre, or Napoleon. If these men had not followed their intuitions, the events that would have taken place might have been much more catastrophic for mankind. But that is the sphere of Providence [God], the sight of which is refused us. We can and may only view ourselves as the tools of Providence [God], some of us more, some less. And no one has the right to evade the task that has been set for him” (Ibid.).
“The Jew is not a socialist! Once before he nailed to the cross the great Creator of the concept of socialist redemption! He will do so again whenever he can! For he is an individualist, an economic liberalist, an egotist—yes, he is a parasitic creature. In Russia the Jews succeeded in directing the will to freedom of oppressed Slavic peoples against allegedly alien rulers. But then, themselves alien, they set themselves in the former rulers’ place. They still occupy it, and I have no reason to believe that the Slavs are making any attempts to oust them again. But as long as that is not the case [meaning, as long as Slavs allow this to continue], a National-Socialist Germany cannot enter into alliances with Russia” (Ibid., p. 167). This is exactly what the alleged Jewish “War on Terror,” [a false flag] and the hoaxist-premonition of “Al Qaeda,” is doing to Americans—we are being indoctrinated by alien Jews in our government to fight against a non-existent enemy. I do not believe Al Qaeda even exists; more than likely, it is a Jewish-Mossad false flag, just as was 9/11. The Mossad slogan is, “Make war by way of deception.”
“I am no follower of Oswald Spengler! I do not believe in the decline of the West. No, I consider it my task, with which [God] has charged me, to contribute to its prevention. I do not believe in a new Slavic culture. No cultures have ever been born under Jewish leadership, though some have been destroyed! On the contrary, I believe that the old Arian culture, which has begun to falter as a result of industrialization, will experience a rebirth under the direction of the Nordic peoples. It will evolve on a socialist basis and [from this premise] then conquer the world [read: ideologically]” (Ibid., p. 168).
“The international powers that are at work to penetrate the unanimity of the national bodies, the states, the nations, to dissolve and undermine them, are therefore contrary to nature and hostile to the divine order. Among them are primarily Jewry, but next in line are the Catholic church, the internationally oriented trade unions, international communism, the major international trusts, and many more. Such organizations can, at times, be stronger than the states [i.e., the United Nations]! And herein lies the danger! Not only for the individual state, but especially for the possibility of creating the great socialist community of nations [emphasis added].
“So, if we pursue the goal of such a community of nations—and it must, as I said, be pursued, and it will be the final goal of human politics on this earth—then we must first reconstruct the independence and autonomy of the nations, even the smallest, and drive the large international organizations back to their purely technical sphere of operations, eliminating every last possibility of their influence on governments and governmental organizations. This is a further basic perception.”
Unlike Bush, Hitler staunchly rejected globalism in its present Jewish-materialistic format. Hitler would not have been opposed to a socialism of the nations, but he absolutely and utterly rejected supranationalism, such as the League of Nations—which evolved into the NWO United Nations—and he would have undoubtedly rebuked the conception of the EU. The EU is a farce, as it is not at all a democratic and representative conception ushered in by the will of the European people; nay, it was forced upon them by Jewish and macrocorporate tyrants. The EU will fall apart, given time, because it is an unnatural and godless entity. Everything the Jews create or touch is shit. So, have faith in the fact that Jewish shit won’t last, just as their nation of shit—Israel—won’t last. Putin is still fixing the shit that the treacherous Jewish murderers and racists left behind in Russia and Eastern Europe. Be patient with him, as he is trying to fix the deep-rooted Jewish shit that was left behind. The path to recovery is long and hard, but the Russian people seem to have persevered through the worst of it. That is commendable. I would also encourage the Russians to stand by Iran, as there is indeed an absolute need for a steadfast, godly bulwark to check Jewish-American power. The America of today is not American; it’s Jewish. Be merciful upon we the American slaves, as we have no more power over these Jewish maniacs than the Slavs or Russians had under the tyrannical Jewish Soviet Socialism. Hitler was careful to distinguish between Slavs and Jews; hopefully, the future occupiers of America will keep in mind that there is a huge difference between Christians and Jews in America.
“Furthermore, the principle in power politics of always oppressing smaller nations, annexing them, occupying them, dissolving their statehood, divesting them of their autonomy, their divinely ordained sovereignty—this is a useless and foolish undertaking, a sin against nature. Even after Poland had for centuries ceased to exist as a state, it continued to harbor the will to form into a nation. Yes, one can say that the suppression of a people, the forced incorporation in artificial borders, or military occupation of a particular country only heighten the will to freedom and the urge to liberation of the people in question” (Ibid., pp. 170-171)!
“The application of this realization is a further great task of the future. Here lie the roots of true religion, the link to divinity! There are those poor creatures, bending their knees and wringing their praying hands before carved wooden figures, and those great hypocrites hoodwink them into believing that, thanks to this behavior, their souls will sizzle a few days less in the fires of hell. But the true link to God, the elevated consciousness of being a divine creature—that is driven out of them and forbidden them! Here is where I see the Logos of St. John, which Luther unfortunately translated as ‘Word.’ Goethe tried to rectify the error with the critical lines: ‘I cannot possibly place such a high value on the word, I must translate it differently,’ and he said: ‘In the beginning was the deed.’ But I say: In the beginning was the urge! And the urge existed from eternity! And the urge was a creation of God, and God Himself was this urge.’ And the urge was the spark of life, which resides in us as well. And though it rose to consciousness in man, we pass it by, as Christ already bemoaned. The peace on earth Christ wanted to bring is the very same socialism of the nations! It is the new great religion, and it will come because it is divine! It awaits the Messiah!
“But I am not the Messiah. He will come after me. I only have the will to create for the German Volk the foundations of a true Volk community…It cannot be otherwise, and everything in me points to the conviction that the German Volk has a divine mission. How many great prophets have foretold this! Once, in deep sorrow, Goethe wrote: ‘The German Volk will fulfill its universal mission only when it is compelled to do so by God’s sword!’ I hope that the [First] World War was God’s sword! Should Providence have another reminder by God’s sword in store for us, that would be a terrible ordeal….[but] I will never betray Europe to Bolshevism and Jewry” (Ibid., pp. 172, 174).
“…It is absolutely wrong and misguided to try and label this sort of thing diabolical. The diabolical involves intention, and a satanic mentality or a satanic will. Both were entirely missing from Hitler’s makeup” (Ibid., p. 180).
“One should never deprive the Volk of its gods, but most especially one must not insult them!” [Hitler] extended both hands to me and answered, “Wagener, I thank you. You are right. One should never deprive the Volk of its gods.” [Hitler had somewhat insulted Hindenburg.] After a short pause he continued, “I won’t do it again.” …in March 1933, outside the Garrison Church in Potsdam, I saw Hitler bowing deeply to Hindenburg, the faithful Ekkehard of the German Volk, in response to the older man’s extending his hand—perhaps the only time Hitler ever bowed to anyone, a gesture preserved in innumerable photographs—I could not help remembering my admonition. Hitler could be guided. Hitler was willing to change” (Ibid., p. 184).
“But the ‘chosen people’ must connect with its old tradition. It had to go to Jerusalem. No other place in the world was as well suited and as significant. At the same time, Christianity—which also has its roots in Jerusalem, the site where its great Creator performed His works—was drawn into the power circle of the newly discovered ‘people of God’” (Ibid., p. 187).
Hitler asked, “But you think that we can take another way?” Wagener replied, “Once we have acquired one hundred percent of the power in the state.” Hitler replied, “And the world?”
Wagener replied, “It [Jewry] will unite all the armies and navies of Europe and America to vanquish us and to remove this deadly peril to the world dominion of financial capital—that is, of Jewry. And they will kill anyone, they will burn all the books and documents that might serve as witnesses of the truth of the perception.”
“And you believe that we would find no support in England?”
“England and America are the ones most strongly interested in preserving the hypnosis. The only nation that might possibly be prepared to follow our thoughts is Russia” (Ibid., pp. 189-190).
“Like Christ we must preach, ‘You are all brothers! Love one another!’ Only we alone can and must think clearly about racial questions. You, and I, and Rosenberg, and one or two others. For us, these questions are a key and a signpost. But for the public at large, they are poison! Besides, such discussion would only rouse superiority and inferiority complexes. And these are the surest way to destroy a Volk community” (Ibid., p. 213).
“Germany, the German Volk! And this Volk will be the sword of God” (Ibid., p. 215).
“For the introduction of a socialist economy is more than a ‘decree’! It requires a moral understanding, an ethical conviction, a religious profession of faith! For in its innermost essence, it is a turning away from the idolatry of previous millennia, the overcoming of a monetary system already attacked by Moses and Christ, which could be maintained to the present day only by keeping people stupid and terrorizing them, and by a mendacious sanctimoniousness. To bring about this powerful revolution is our mission…” (Ibid., p. 263).
“In the last analysis, this is the fulfillment of the meaning and mandate of divine creation, given to all the peoples and races of the world. Its accomplishment is the true religion, as was once acknowledged and taught by Christ; we must shape it anew” (Ibid., p. 292).
“The church drew on Bible stories and the will to glorify God. We must derive our subjects from the new spirit stirring in our time, from the will to community, to the sense of sacrifice for the Volk and the faith of the Volk in the fulfillment of its longing for freedom and equality, for work and greatness, and for justice before God and man” (Ibid., p. 310).
“That is the moment in which we live! The National Socialist movement is the harbinger of the return to the will and |