|
Hitler Speaks: What Did Hitler Really Say?
“The decay of the nation systematically spread by the Marxist false doctrine in worldview-wise inconsistent opposites means the destruction of the basis of a possible community life.” · Speech of 23 March 1933, Berlin
“The dissolution strikes all foundations of social order. The totally inconsistent attitude of the individual to the concepts of state, society, religion, morality, family and economy rips open differences, which leads to a war of all against everybody.” · Ibid
“The world-idea of the liberal era invited the international idea of Marxist socialism [insinuating ‘false socialism’ here; an undermining of true, cooperative socialism] to be its successor, and this flows into anarchist chaos or communist dictatorship.” · Speech of 5 September 1934, Nürnberg
I think it is crucial to note here that what the Bush Administration—as well as the internationalist Neo-Con movement, spearheaded by Jewry—is ushering in as an ‘order’, is a staunch-outright opposition to the ‘order’ that Hitler had attempted to usher in. There is an enormous difference between Communist-style totalitarianism and National Socialism—as practiced by Hitler and the ‘Nazi-Sozis’. Hitler’s National Socialism was the antithesis of Stalin’s Communist-Socialism, as the two differed in too many ways to be counted. One has to have a really good grasp of history to be able to fully comprehend the differences, but when pseudo-scholars attempt to compare Hitler and Bush, they fail to understand that there is no correlation there, whatsoever. Bush could more accurately and justifiably be compared to Stalin, Lenin, or Trotsky. Hitler could more rightly be—though not without discrepancies—be compared to Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, or even Thomas More.
George Bush, Jr. is an ardent globalist, multiculturalist, as well as internationalist, who advocates war for others—in our case today, Israel, as pointed up in The Israel Lobby dissertation, by Mssrs. Walt and Mearsheimer. Hitler fought a war of national self-determination against internationalism—he was more than anything an ‘isolationist’ in the most intense meaning of the term. Hitler loathed internationalism and wanted to ward off globalism. He also did not condone immigrants imposing their will upon his country, or anywhere else in Europe, for that matter. However, he did allow immigrants to work in Germany, but they were not given citizenship, nor were they given rights above and beyond those of German citizens. Hitler always put his people first, and for anyone to say that this was ‘evil’ of him, is absurdity personified.
“Proceeding from the liberalism of the previous century, this development naturally finds its end in communist chaos.” · Speech 23 March 1933, Berlin
“The preservation of the broadest middle-class is just as necessary for [and] in itself [a] healthfully balanced folk organism, as it forms a necessary prerequisite for a real preservation of property.” · ‘Adolf Hitler’s Program,’ appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
“The middle class will not be saved by criticism and theories, rather precisely it is bound for better or worse to the salvation of the peasantry and the worker.” · Speech of 1 May 1934, Berlin
“Does a party want to talk of the struggle of Christianity, which for fourteen years sat with atheists, with deniers of God?” · Speech of 20 February 1933, Cologne
“I do not understand… that one speaks in the fashion of the centrum [1. A center of any kind, especially an anatomical center. 2. The major part of a vertebra, exclusive of the bases of the neural arch. 3. A point around which something rotates or revolves] against godlessness, but at the same time makes a pact with the godless [Communists, Marxists, Jewry].” · ‘Adolf Hitler’s Program,’ appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
“The centrum [see definition above, as Hitler seems to have really, really liked using this word] represents the idea of the solidarity of a specific religious denomination [i.e., “Protestant” or “Catholic”]. Other folks, even if they think and act ever so fanatically according to the principles of their religious faith, are first sons of their folk, and only then do they stand for the idea of a religious denomination.” · Speech of 10 April 1923, Munich
“Jewish democracy [Hitler said that “democracy” was really extracted from the word daemos, or devil] of majority rule [insinuating “mob rule”]: always and ever only a means… for the destruction of the [actually] Aryan leadership.” In other words, for Hitler, democracy was simply a Jewish means to an [destructive] end. · Speech of 12 April 1922, Munich
“The centrum [once again, Hitler’s “seemingly” favorite word] sacrificed its Christian ideals. The center-of-road parties abandon the middle class.” · ‘Adolf Hitler’s Program,’ appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
This should really make sense to Americans today, as we are seeing both the GOP, as well as Democratic, party “sell-out” the middle class in favor of globalism, big-business, and rampant, unbridled illegal immigration. Let it be known that this illegal immigration is a human-rights violation in itself—the idea of greed-ridden businesses and business owners using the under-paid labor of “lesser, brown workers.” I assure you that this is what they really think, as I have heard some of them talk in private, especially contractors. The people that hire illegals as “slave labor for slave wages” are the true racists in this world. Anyone who can “use” human beings like this is a piece of trash. The Mexican migrants are, for the most part, innocent people just trying to live their lives, just like we here in America; but, nobody will be prosperous when the collapse comes. Illegal immigration has to be stopped as a matter of survival, responsibility, and principle. It has nothing to do with race, but it has everything to do with breaking Jewish and macrocorporate control of America—”The Great Satan.”
“Internationalism and democracies are inseparable concepts.” · Lecture of 27 January 1932, Düsseldorf
“Democracy” has been the cause of as much war, destruction, and conflict as “Christianity”. Palestinians are being mass murdered for “Democracy”. The Middle East was partitioned for “Democracy”. Iraqis were—and are still being—mass murdered in order for “Democracy” to come in. Germans were murdered en masse (WWII & Dresden Holocaust) in the name of “Democracy”. Africans suffer and die on a daily basis—completely unnecessarily—for the continuation of Capitalist “Democracy”. Latin America has undergone tremendous murder and war in order that they might successfully usher in “democratic” governments—again, for “Democracy”. I am shocked that more people don’t sit back and really think about what all has been done in the name of “Democracy”. It is no wonder Hitler and the Nazi-Sozis loathed “Democracy”, as it has certainly led to war and death almost one-hundred percent of the time throughout its short-lived history. One need only notice that Rome and Greece were “Democracies”, both of which failed miserably. Hitler told Wagener that “Democracy” was really derived from the root word daemos, or devil. He may well have been right.
“The proletariat (of the Marxist era)… is outwardly pacifist and inwardly terrorist, the bourgeoisie, on the other hand, wants to be a terrorist outwardly and a pacifist inwardly.” · Speech of 20 April (Hitler’s birthday) 1923, Munich
“They suffocate in their own compromises. Marxism invariably flows not only politically, rather also culturally, into nihilism.” · Speech of 1 September 1933, Nürnberg
That (the international German state [emphasis added]) is the paradise of the Jews.” · Speech of 27 April 1923, Munich
“There are… only two possibilities: either victory of the Aryan [implying Christian-Western civilization] or its destruction and the victory of the Jews [implying internationalism, capitalism, Marxism, globalism and all that goes along with those ideologies].” · Speech of 12 April 1922, Munich
“The family… is the smallest, but most valuable unit in the construction of the entire state structure. … Work honors the woman as well as the man. The child, however, ennobles the mother” [emphasis added]. · ‘Adolf Hitler’s Program,’ appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
“That the German youth again possess a feeling of honor, fills me with joy.” · Interview 18 October 1933, Berlin
Indeed, when Hitler witnessed the young German women singing to him, while he stood on the balcony, he cried. Hans Baur discusses this moment in his collection of memoirs entitled, Hitler at My Side.
“What will… finally triumph, is the fire of the German youth.” · 4 May 1923, Munich
Hitler discussed this “youth fire” with his Economic Minister Otto Wagener, in Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant. He brought up the fact that when he accompanied young people he could feel their vibrancy and life emanating like an “Odic force,” which he noticed did not emanate from older people. Hitler loved being around young people, especially children and young women, because they were so carefree and full of joy. In fact, Hitler told Heinrich Hoffmann [Hitler Was My Friend] that every time he got around his niece, he instantly felt better. He used to go on shopping trips with his niece, even though he hated going shopping and it took all day long, simply to be around her, because it brought him great comfort. Hitler gave a most incredible lecture on the importance of women—to Wagener—and every man would do well to read what he said.
“Salvation of the peasantry means salvation of the German nation.” · ‘Adolf Hitler’s Program,’ appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
“Against him (the worker) no state should be formed, no, it should rise with him!” · Speech of 10 May 1933, Berlin
“It will be the firm goal of the movement [National Socialism], which I and my fellow fighters represent, to elevate the word “worker” to the German nation’s great title of honor.” · Ibid.
“On the day when both ideas (nationalism and socialism) merge into a single one, they are invincible.” · Appeal for the election of 31 July 1932
Again, this alludes to the concept of a thesis (Nationalism) and antithesis (Socialism) coming together to form a new synthesis (National Socialism). This is remnant of the Hegelian Dialectic; Hegel believed that each synthesis revealed a piece of God via human history. It is the concept that essentially asserts the idea that God is revealed through historical events… that each synthesis is evolutionary progress toward man’s full understanding and realization of God.
“I want… to wish to the great “German Work Front” that its leadership and all its members never lose faith, come what may.” · Decree concerning the “German Worker Front,” 24 October 1934
“The economy is something secondary.” · Speech of 18 September 1922, Munich
“In the end only the total strength of a nation will protect and defend the economy.” · Speech of 16 May 1934, Berlin
“We try to always keep our household intact.” · Speech of 24 October 1933, Berlin
“In the economy only ability should be decisive.” · Speech of 6 July 1933, Berlin
“I protest against it that somebody becomes head of an enterprise only because he is appointed to it. He must also be suited to it by nature, and that proves itself through his own performance and ability.” · Speech of 16 May 1934, Berlin
Hitler appointed a few of his relatives to positions within the party and government, however when they failed to live up to their duties successfully, they were promptly dismissed from their posts. Hitler was a man who practiced what he preached, and he did not succumb to nepotism. He would offer his own—as well as party adjutants—relatives and/or friends positions in his government, or military, based on their skill and merit. If they proved unsatisfactory, they were promptly replaced by more qualified officials. No one was kept on board if they could not handle their position in an efficient and effective manner.
“One day the melting pot of America will face an ever-healthier Europe, rich in children, blooming in discipline and voluntary order. Today weapons still speak and economy struggles against economy. But there is probably no question what will triumph in the long run, [either] clean blood [a united empire—or nation—of uniform ethnicity] or the “bastard” [an empire—or nation—of many ethnicities, which Hitler believed would ultimately lead to strife, division, and balkanization].” · The SS Looks at America, p. 9.
“It is no coincidence that religions are more stable forms of government [think of an Islamic Republic vs. American “Demon-ocracy”]. They mostly tend to sink their roots deeper into the earth; they would not be conceivable at all without this broad folk.” · Speech of 10 May 1933, Berlin
Essentially what Hitler is trying to convey to the people is the magnitude, or significance, of the people for whom specific religions are geared. Hitler respected Buddha and Confucius just as much as Christ. Think of it this way: If Jesus had wished to see the Chinese or the Indians as the harbingers of His Message, then He would have traveled to those people and preached to them. He did not. He preached to Western European Gentiles in order to convey to them the oracles of God; Jesus was merely the fleshly vehicle through which God spoke His Message of socialism, redemption, eternal life, and eternal struggle against evil [read: Jewry]. So, Jesus was not the Son of God, nor was He sent into the world to be massacred and mocked by Jewry, but rather, to reveal God’s will for mankind. He chose the Western Europeans not as the “chosen race,” but as the people who would stop Jewry and help to liberate all the races of the world from the evil and malevolent Jewish stranglehold.
Americans have become especially duped by Jewry, as they will to do good, but because their hearts and minds are overthrown by the Beast, they are only able to produce rotten fruit (i.e., Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq). Jesus specifically preached to Western Europeans because He knew that they were the only people collectively capable of partaking of such a high level of responsibility; it is White man’s duty to help all other races of mankind, to bring them up with him, to liberate them, and to set the world free of Jewish hatred. The reason this is so is because White people have erected the very systems and ideals upon which the entire world must function. That is also why Jews have leeched onto the White peoples…not to help humanity, but to enslave it.
The Jews have recognized Jesus’ Gentilism as a self-evident truth, so they seek to bring White man down, and all the rest of mankind with him; we are all subject to this one doom. No race of men is greater than any other…there is no chosen race or men of God. God created all people and loves them all equally; Jews invented racism to make us hate one another, and they deliberately support immigration and race-mixing to bastardize all of us and make us full of hatred for one another—when we really ought to be hating the very harbingers of this destructive and hateful ethos. There is only one sect of men who seeks to destroy us all for his own gain. You know exactly who I am talking about. Everyone else in this world is just trying to live their lives; they don’t want war; they don’t want death; they don’t want chaos. They just want to live. That will never happen until Jewry is properly controlled and managed by all of us.
“In that the government is determined to undertake the political and moral detoxification of our public life, it creates and secures the prerequisites for a really deep return of religious life.” · Speech of 23 March 1933, Berlin
“The Reich government, which sees in Christianity the unshakeable fundaments of the folk’s ethics and morality.” · Speech of 23 March 1933, Berlin
These two quotes were indeed public, but they do not at all contrast the things Hitler had said in private. Hitler regarded Jesus and His teachings alone as the measure for what constituted his definition of Christianity. He did not have respect for the priest class or the churches: firstly, due to the horrific histories of both; secondly, because Jesus had opposed both the social order, and the priest class, in His day—namely, the Jewish Pharisees and Sadducees who have vainly interjected themselves in between God and man. So, Hitler identified himself as a Christian, in that he espoused the teachings of Jesus, and not necessarily those of the churches. Even so, Hitler knew that institutional Christianity had to remain intact, as he understood that there was no faith or institution that he could erect which would successfully supplant such a long-lived worldview. He respected the fact that the Christian ethos had survived for so long, but he also understood that if it remained too dogmatic it would “devour itself”; especially in light of scientific progress and reason.
“And no less have we taken up the struggle against the decomposition of religion. Without us committing ourselves to any denomination, we have nonetheless again given faith the prerequisite, because we were of the conviction that the folk requires and needs this faith. We have thus taken up the struggle against godlessness not with a few theoretical declarations, we have exterminated it.” · Speech of 14 October 1933, Berlin
Hitler liked to use the terms “extermination” and “annihilation” quite often, and never were these terms to be taken literally as the Jews would have us believe. Hitler used a powerful and absolute lexicon because he wanted to make a heavy and forceful impression upon his listeners and opponents. He certainly reviled Jewry and atheism, but this was not done simply to arouse hatred for these two things; on the contrary, it was designed to arouse the people’s awareness of these things. Atheism, secularism, and Judaism were to be found everywhere in German society, which really troubled and bothered Hitler. He understood that Christianity alone had long been a steadfast and zealous opponent of these various evil ideologies and so, he utilized it not only for expediency, but because he, personally, had really believed in it. Not every Nazi-Sozi was a Christian, or had believed in God; but, Hitler was a Christian and he believed in God, so that is all that really matters. This is not about Naziism; it’s about Hitler and his National Socialism, which has been historically reduced to Himmler’s speeches on the “master race,” and the isolated activities of pagan Nazis, like Rosenberg and Ludendorff. There is a lot more to the Third Reich than that, and that is what we try and demonstrate. Hitler probably really had been betrayed by quite a few individuals and groups, but we cannot allow the betrayals and actions of a minority decide the historical fate of Hitler and his movement.
“The discussion of the new state with both Christian denominations: Filled with the wish to secure for the German folk the great religions, ethical and moral values anchored in both Christian denominations, we have eliminated the political organizations, but strengthened the religious institutions. For a contract with the energetic National Socialist state is more valuable to a church than the struggle of denominational federations, which in their coalition-determined politics of compromise must also buy professional advantages for party supporters with the surrender of ideals and of the really inner religious education and consolidation of the folk. We all, however, live in the expectation that the merger of the Evangelical Reich Church may give real satisfaction to the yearning of those, who believe they must fear in the absent-mindedness of evangelical life a weakening of the strength of the evangelical faith in itself. In that the National Socialist state has in this year proven its respect for the strength of the Christian denominations, it expects the same respect from the denominations for the strength of the National Socialist state!” [emphasis added] · Speech of 30 January 1934, Berlin
This is one of Hitler’s deepest and most profound public proclamations because it really gives us a sense of his honest feelings towards the Christian faith vs. the Christian church. He espoused these very same precepts when he spoke in private with Goebbels, Goering, Eckart, Wagener, Bormann, Ludecke, [Ernst] Hanfstaengl, Traudl Junge, and [Hans] Baur, among others. Hitler had greatly respected the churches and priests and had refused to participate in a Kulturkampf, as he knew that it would not only have been fruitless, but would have also greatly exacerbated the religious struggle and inner division. Hitler gave to the churches and denominations the respect that they wanted from him, but they were unwilling to give him and the state the equal respect they had earned and deserved, in return. This is un-Christian and completely hypocritical—and then for bigoted hypocrites like Niemöller to run amok acting the role of the persecuted churchman on top of all of that. Ludecke (1938) had even said, “Hitler, no matter how vehemently he had denounced political clericalism, had always carefully distinguished between the temporal and spiritual spheres, and had never attacked the Catholic faith” (p. 241).
I really am stunned that Hitler did not have Niemöller executed…I really am. It stuns me, because Hitler seemed like the type of person who just would not have tolerated this kind of crap. Hitler was actually very tolerant of intriguers and problem-makers, and it has really helped to exonerate him from any kind of unnecessary harshness or cruelty on his part. He really was a very decent person and a remarkably flexible dictator. Hitler had actually said that he was not a dictator. According to Fest, he had lamented, “Any popinjay can rule as a dictator.” He wanted his people’s support. He did not want to rule over them by fear, coercion, and force.
“We have endeavored to produce the reconciliation of the denominations with the new state, are determined—insofar as the evangelical denominations are meant—to end their purely organizational fractionalization in a great Evangelical Reich Church, filled with the conviction that it is not acceptable to make a virtue out of the respect and consideration for the individual states, forced on Martin Luther by need, in a time when the states themselves already no longer exist. And we know: If the great reformer [Luther] stood among us, then he would—happy to have escaped the need of that time—just like Ulrich von Hutten in his last prayer, think not of provincial churches, rather of Germany and his evangelical church.” · Speech of 5 September 1934, Nürnberg
Hitler had been especially inspired by Martin Luther and Ulrich von Hutten. He had written that von Hutten’s last note, upon seizing his pen, had greatly inspired him. Hitler said, “I am deeply stirred by the word which Ulrich Hutten wrote the last time he seized his pen: —Deutschland” (A.P. Laurie, 1937). The fact that this greatly stirred Hitler means that his faith knew deeper roots than the faith of most alleged Christians. The very survival of the German people—if not the Germanic race—meant the survival of Christianity, because Hitler realized that Christianity was a German religion. Christianity does not belong to anyone but the German people; it is their understanding of God, and its Judaization and falsification have been the single greatest crimes against the German people in their history. Hitler realized that Jesus had been falsified and Judaized, and so he set about repairing this crime (Ludecke, p. 521). He took it upon himself—meaning that he alone had assumed responsibility where so many others had continued down the path of irresponsibility and self-indulgence—to correct this crime against humanity. The Jews are guilty, and they owe Germans one massive apology—including monetary reparations if needs be. Jesus Christ is Germany’s, and no other race of men has claim to Him. He is our God and we do not share our God with anyone. If they want to partake of His Message, all power to them, but He belongs to us—the Germanic people of the world, and no one else. He speaks to us, for us, and He walks with us, as we are the ones entrusted with His oracles, and we are the ones who believe His Message and live His word. It is us and us alone who claim the Message of Christ; not Jewry. They await their Antichrist Messiah, Solomon, who will seek our destruction. Jews hate and revile Christ and denounce Him as a “murderer,” “bastard,” and “fool,” in their lascivious Talmud of Satanism (Talmud Unmasked, 2005). We will not allow the destruction of Christ’s doctrine, because it is ours. Jews can take our lives, but they will never claim our God or faith as their own. Never.
Ludecke (1937) had lamented, “Meanwhile the atrocity propaganda was assuming dangerous proportions throughout the world, and Germany was threatened with complete isolation. On one of my jaunts to the chancellery toward the end of March, I talked briefly with Goebbels about the seriousness of the situation. Cocksure as ever, he announced that something gigantic was about to be decided upon, something which would surprise the world and throw Jewry into a panic. “I plan a tremendous blow,” he boasted, “that will end the crisis” (p. 594).
It turns out that, perhaps, Goebbels had taken Jewry by surprise, as he may have secretly organized Kristallnacht as a direct reaction against the continued debilitating Jewish boycott against Germany. According to Ingrid Weckert (1985), Hitler had not even been in the know about this retaliation. He was rather upset by it because he knew what potential dire repercussions it might be capable of producing. He blamed and reprimanded Goebbels, but the Jews would have destroyed Germany, regardless. They have willed its destruction from its inception, and the rise of Hitler as the subconsciously recognized Advocate of Christ simply exacerbated Germany’s challenge to Jewish power. They had to break it, no matter the consequences. Jewish bankers, and Jewish bankers alone, caused WWII—all in the name of their father Yahweh.
Some people have gone so far as to propose that Reichskristallnacht was a self-inflicted hate-hoax—the idea that the Jews did this to themselves to further incite International Jewry against the Germans. This argument may need more evidentiary qualification, but the Germans made the case for suing the Jews for damages (Judicial Inc, n.d.). A borderline vagabond, and possibly homosexual Jew named Herschel Grynzspan assassinated Ernst vom Rath prior to “Crystal Night”; possibly in order to exact revenge against his “boyfriend” (Salera, 2002; Weckert, 1985). Additionally, a Dutch Communist—possibly of Jewish extraction—named Marinus van der Lubbe was in all probability the man who had razed the Reichstag (Jew Watch, n.d.). Hitler remained remarkably lenient with Communist leaders and Jews even after these magnanimous incidents (Dietrich, p. 22-23, 26; see also Clark, 2006).
According to a surprisingly objective version of this event produced by Wikipedia (n.d.):
... At his trial, Van der Lubbe was found guilty and sentenced to death. He was beheaded on January 10, 1934, three days before his 25th birthday. The Nazis alleged that Van der Lubbe was part of the Communist conspiracy to burn down the Reichstag and seize power, while the Communists alleged that Van der Lubbe was part of the Nazi conspiracy to blame the crime on them. Van der Lubbe for his part maintained that he had acted alone, to protest the condition of the German working-class.
Communist Party leadership is acquitted
The Leipzig Trial took part from September 21 to December 23, 1933, and was presided over by judges from the old German Imperial Court, called the Reichsgericht. The Leipzig Trial was widely publicized and was broadcast on the radio. It was expected the court would find the Communists guilty on all counts and approve the repression and terror exercised by the Nazis against all opposition forces in the country. It was clear the first time Georgi Dimitrov spoke that would not happen. Dimitrov had given up his right to a court appointed lawyer and defended himself successfully. He proved his innocence and the innocence of his Communist comrades and was set free. In addition, he presented evidence that the organizers of the fire were senior members of the Nazi Party.
Hitler was furious with the outcome of this trial. He decreed that henceforth treason – among many other offenses – would only be tried by a newly established Volksgerichtshof (People's Court) which later became infamous for the enormous number of death sentences it handed down while led by Roland Freisler (Jew Watch).
This version of the story coincides somewhat with that of Hitler’s Press Chief, Dr. Otto Dietrich, and partially with that of Kurt Ludecke (Dietrich, p. 25). Dietrich had believed wholeheartedly that Hitler had nothing to do with it. Ludecke (1938) was under the impression that Goering and Goebbels had secretly conspired to orchestrate the Reichstag fire without Hitler’s knowledge. The only man who may have had answers as to the true culprits behind this event, and who, according to Ludecke, had the paperwork to prove it, was Karl Ernst (p. 773). Ernst was murdered during the “Night of the Long Knives” and had more than likely been the victim of either Goering or Goebbels. It might be pertinent to mention that neither Ludecke nor Dietrich had reason to exonerate Hitler had he truly been the culprit behind this incident. Ludecke had fled to America after being Hitler’s prisoner and Dietrich had written his memoirs while in British custody after the war had ended. Even so, Weckert (1985) does not believe that Goebbels was behind the events of “Crystal Night”.
“In July 1933, four months after the Jewish proclamation of war in the London Daily Express, Samuel Untermeyer, a Jewish lawyer from New York founded the “International Jewish Economic Federation to Combat the Hitlerite Oppression of Jews” in Amsterdam. A month later, in August 1933, Untermeyer returned to New York. At his reception, he gave a talk, published in the New York Times, in which he emphasized once again the state of war in which World Jewry stood against Germany:
I deeply appreciate your enthusiastic greeting on my arrival today, which I quite understand is addressed not to me personally but to the holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are now embarked ( … ) It is a war that must be waged unremittingly until the black clouds of bigotry, race hatred and fanaticism that have descended upon what was once Germany, but is now medieval Hitler-land, have been dispersed. ( … ) If we once admit, as is brazenly insisted by the German Government, that such fiendish persecution of the people of one race or creed is an internal domestic affair and not a world concern, how are we to know whose turn will be next? Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the monstrous claim that the slaughter, starvation and annihilation, by a country that has reverted to barbarism, of its own innocent and defenseless citizens without rhyme, reason or excuse is an internal affair against which the rest of the world must stand idly by and not lift a hand in defense. ( … ) Amazingly, could we not have a Palestinian-Arabian leader rise up from Palestine and actually make and support these very claims against the Jews of Murder-rael today? In this case, there is actually evidence for said crimes, unlike the so-called “crimes” of the Germans of “Hitler-land.” When the tale is told, as it will be some day ( … ) the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war ( … ) will pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a ( … ) people ( … ) In other words, the Jews were going on about “extermination” as early as 1933. Lies! In conclusion, permit me ( … ) to assure you that, with your support and that of our millions of non-Jewish friends, we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism that has dared raise its ugly head to slander, belie and disgrace twentieth century civilization. This is why Hitler interned Jews and their collaborators, as potential “enemies of the state.” Is it any wonder why? What if illegal immigrants and their “collaborators”—including priests and Jews—declared economic war on Americans? How might you respond, little American? Would you allow the starvation and death of yourselves and your children, or would you take measures against your enemies? Case closed. Here, again, are the “monstrous” accusations: …“fiendish persecution … slaughter … starvation … annihilation … devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned extermination.” The assertions become ever more menacing, and gradually assume a posture very familiar to us today. Untermeyer does not base his charges on any identified occurrences, but smears the German government with blanket accusations about “brazenly” arrogating to itself the right to inflict barbarities on its Jews. The rise of National Socialism—that concerned only the Germans themselves—was branded as “bigotry” and “fanaticism.” The desire of the German people to live as they wished in their own country was denied them. Not only the Jewish people, the whole world (“millions of our non-Jewish friends throughout the world”) are called upon to take part in this “holy war” against Germany, and to help put the “last nail into the coffin” in which the German people are to be buried. And here we sit, screaming at Muslims and attacking them in their own Fatherlands, which they are honorably defending against our unleashed barbarism—they are doing nothing different than the Jews of yesterday. The Jews declared “holy war” against Germany, and Americans mass murdered Germans—and millions of other Europeans during WWII—as collaborators in this Jewish “holy war.” So, why is the Muslim “holy war” against the West evil again? I fail to see the contrast here. Furthermore, this sounds like more bigotry on the part of America. We invent our enemies so that we can pave the way for Jewish world consolidation…oh joy! One can hardly wait to partake of that little blood-bath! Untermeyer’s address holds a sentence that makes clear what it was that inflamed World Jewry to such rage. After the ill-omened peace “Diktat” of Versailles, the world had grown accustomed no longer to regard Germany as a sovereign state. For fourteen years, Germany had been the playground of international smugglers and other racketeers, a land that was for sale, open to exploitation by any swindler who came along. A criminal upper crust, with widespread international family relationships danced on the bodies of the hungering German people, celebrated orgies, spent lavishly the money extracted by fraudulent manipulations from the impoverished people. The German people had to bow and stay silent. That millions of Germans nevertheless dared to rise up against that, and to chase the parasites out of the country—that was the real German crime. “After they dared—to raise their head,” said Samuel Untermeyer. He outdoes himself in reviling the rise of the new Germany and in defaming it in the eyes of the world. In Germany, indignation at the hypocritical behavior of World Jewry was at its highest among the German Jews. They did not delay in contradicting the empty charges, and in stating that the issue lay in political and economic interests. Unfortunately for them, they also fell under persecution, due to the inanity and idiocy of their own wicked people. Jews have got to begin to collectively hold their leadership accountable, and denounce their collective wickedness if they want to actually be forgiven and get anywhere in life. Stop screaming “Poor me, poor me,” and start taking some real decisive action. Show non-Jews that you aren’t worms. Before we call on the Jews themselves to testify as to how mendacious this whole hate-propaganda was, here are a few last references from the “declaration of war” of 24 March 1933: The old and reunited people of Israel are rising up with new and modern weapons to fight their age-old battle with their persecutors...What was meant by “new and modern weapons” is revealed right away: pressure by the worldwide Jewish money power. Jewish financiers will exert pressure. and the exertion of influence by Jewish organizations on the governments of individual countries. Representative Jewish organizations in the European capitals are understood to be making representations to their various governments. It should be borne in mind that the Jewish organizations in the European capitals represented tiny minorities of the populations of the individual countries. And yet, those minorities presumed to press demand on the governments—a deportment that makes a farce of every democratic constitution. Failure to go along incurred threats of pressure by Jewish monetary forces (Weckert, n.d.).
What nation-state, in its right mind, allows a tiny minority to bulldoze the majority—in their own Fatherland, for gawd’s sake—into extinction? This is sheer madness, and for anyone to try and state otherwise would qualify as first-rate insanity. Hitler was elected by the people, of the people, for the people, and if the German people wanted Jewry reasonably dealt with, well then, Jewry should have submitted to the will of their host nation. Instead, they lamented like little pussies—as always—and whined and cried about being “victims,” once again. Goi, wake up from your slumber before you bring about the downfall of us all.
Jewry openly tried to break the German nation—young old, women and men—financially, because they knew that they could, being the controllers of the world’s wealth. Lenni Brenner addresses this very point in his compilation book, Fifty-One Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis. Hitler had really gotten himself into a bind, which Goebbels certainly had helped usher along, though probably unintentionally—and he really had to pull some strings and work diligently to keep Germany from crashing and burning. His response to the boycott was only natural—harsher measures against Jewry. Only a fool would have allowed the Jews to get away with this relentless bigotry and wickedness. They are truly an evil people who seem to love watching others starve to death and burn under the Jewish flame of hatred and malice. Just take a look at what they’re doing to Arabian women and children and tell me that that is not cruelty of the most satanic and hateful ilk. Even Luther had ordered the Christians to “deal with them [Jews] harshly” (Luther, p. 60). He wasn’t kidding. Hitler had said, in 1943, “We will break and shatter the power of the Jewish world coalition. Humanity—fighting for freedom, life, and daily bread—will achieve final victory in this struggle” (The SS Looks at America, p. 5). This is essentially the same thing Jesus had said some 2,000-plus years ago. This is literally an epochal struggle between good and evil—and according to most religions, God’s people achieve final victory over Jewry.
“The national government sees in both Christian denominations the most important factors for the preservation of our folkdom. It will respect the contracts made between them and the provinces. Their rights should not be infringed. It expects, however, and hopes that the work on the national and moral rejuvenation of our folk, which the government has made its task, likewise receives the same appreciation. It will deal with all other denominations with objective justice. But it cannot tolerate that membership in a specific denomination or in a specific race could be release from the general legal obligations or even a license for unpunished committing or toleration of crimes. The concern of the government is directed at the honest coexistence of church and state.” · Speech of 23 March 1933, Berlin
Once again, Hitler is reiterating the point that the state would respect all denominations, but in return for this respect, he asked that the denominations respect the state. He believed in separation of church and state for the most part, as he did not wish to give one denomination any more financial or moral support than the other, for fear of further division. Hitler’s ultimate goal was the creation of a unified Reich Church, but regrettably, that vision never came to fruition—due to the divisiveness and politics of the church members themselves. The fact that clergymen have become so power-hungry and politically motivated ought to be a red flag for most Christians; but alas, it does not seem to make much of an impression upon the feeble-minded sheeple. By the way, Hitler called the Germans “sheep people” in Mein Kampf. Some things never change.
“Not we, rather those before us, distanced themselves from Christianity. We have merely made a clean separation between politics, which concerns itself with earthly things, and religion, which must occupy itself with the spiritual.” · Speech of 27 August 1934, Ehrenbreitstein
“And above all, we have removed the priests from the marsh of political party conflict and led them back into the church again. It is our will that they should never return to an area, which is not created for them, which degrades them and must invariably bring them into opposition to millions of people, who inwardly want to be devout, but who want to see priests who serve God and not a political party!” · Speech of 24 October 1933, Berlin
Hitler had given the priests peace of mind in that he relegated to them their rightful place and guaranteed their sovereignty and coexistence so long as they did not challenge the work of the state. Hitler never did anything to the German people that might have given the priests ammunition for an attack against him; rather, the priests who wanted to see the continuation of Jewish influence and the Jewish ethos throughout Germany consistently attacked Hitler. But, were they attacking Hitler, or the will of the German nation? Weren’t they really attacking Germany? Why did they not help Jews leave Germany, as opposed to coercing Germans to accept the un-Christian Jewish ethos?
The fact of the matter is, the priests who attacked Hitler on these grounds were traitors against the German people. Priests like Niemöller were no different than the ADL, JDL, SPLC [Sothern Poverty Law Center, which is probably a Jewish-Mossad front organization that terrorizes academics and American citizens in their own country; usually, on false, distorted, or trumped-up charges], and ACLU of today; which all appear to defend illegal immigrants and Jewish supremacist hate groups against the American people. It is not different at all. The priests who are helping the illegal immigrants are hurting both parties—in the long run—and ought to be considered enemies of the state for violating the will of the American people and encouraging “deportation of labor”—a crime against humanity. The ADL and ACLU—both Jewish founded and led—are also enemies of the American people, as they threaten us in our own country when we have done nothing but exercise our American right to free speech and thought (MacDonald, pp. 245, xiv-xv). Why must these organizations, which allegedly espouse freedom and equality for all, threaten American citizens of all ethnicities and races? What are they trying to hide? What is their ultimate agenda; a neo-KGB/NKVD? One must constantly consider this possibility, as it is safer to be overly cautious, and to overshoot, than be imprisoned or murdered because one did not presume enough.
“Lord, you see, we have changed. The German folk is no longer the folk of dishonor, of shame, of self-mutilation, of faintheartedness, and of small faith [read: simple faith]. No, Lord, the German folk is strong again in its will, strong in its perseverance, strong in the endurance of all sacrifices. Lord, we will not depart from you! Now bless our struggle for our freedom and thus our German folk and fatherland!” · Speech of 1 May 1933, Berlin
|