|
Hitler Speaks: On Christianity and Divine Truth
Explaining Jewry
According to Martin Bormann (2002), Hitler said:
I believe that Providence gives the victory to the man who knows how to use the brains nature has given him. The notions of law invented by the jurists have little to do with natural laws. The wisdom of nations sometimes expresses truths as old as the world, that perfectly reproduce nature’s intentions. ‘God helps him who helps himself!’ It’s obvious that man forgets his own destiny” (p. 341).
In this passage, not only has Hitler written off the laws of men as mere “notions of law,” but he has also indicted mankind on the premise of forgetting his own “destiny.” If Christians continue to delude themselves, acting as though they can survive on God’s grace without any natural sustenance, then they will quickly discover that their bodies will die. Only a fool believes that he or she can survive on God’s will alone. God gave mankind the earth and the human will as gifts. Animals do not have a will or a destiny, they merely live day-to-day, instinctually. Men have been given the ability to control fate, whereas animals are controlled by fate. But, the men who have chosen to control the earth, and replace God’s will with their own, are quickly realizing that their will is purely destructive and wicked. Hitler believed that these destructive men were the Jews.
He told Bormann (2002), “The destructive role of the Jew has in a way a providential explanation. If nature wanted the Jew to be the ferment that causes peoples to decay, thus providing these peoples with an opportunity for a healthy reaction, in that case people like [Rabbi] St. Paul and Trotsky are, from our point of view, the most valuable. By the fact of their presence, they provoke the defensive reaction of the attacked organism. Dietrich Eckart once told me that in all his life he had known just one good Jew: Otto Weininger, who killed himself on the day when he realized that the Jew lives upon the decay of peoples. It is remarkable that the half-caste Jew, to the second or third generation, has a tendency to start flirting with pure Jews. But from the seventh generation onwards, it seems the purity of the Arian blood is restored. In the long run nature eliminates the noxious elements” (p. 141).
He went on… “Obviously, our racial laws demand great strictness on the part of the individual. But to judge of their value, one mustn’t let oneself be guided by particular cases. It is necessary to bear in mind that by acting as I do I am avoiding innumerable conflicts for the future. I’m convinced that there are Jews in Germany who have behaved correctly—in the sense that they’ve invariably refrained from doing injury to the German idea. It’s difficult to estimate how many of them there are, but what I also know is that none of them has entered into conflict with his co-racialists in order to defend the German idea against them” (Bormann, p. 140).
I want to stop here and just force you to reflect deeply upon this short passage, because it tells us much about Hitler’s seriousness and his character. Even though Hitler reviled Jews on the whole, he did not allow inhumane premises to guide his policies and conclusions. He recognized that there were decent Jews, even though they were very few and far between, and was willing to defend them, in spite of his adjutants. In this instance he was conversing with both Walter Hewel and Martin Bormann.
This passage also shows us that Hitler was no sell-out, as he took his laws forbidding marriage between Germans and Jews quite seriously. He lamented the fact that it was a severe handicap on individual freedom, but, he also cared enough about the German people to disregard the lamentations of a few individuals for the sake of the majority. Make no mistake, this was utilitarianism in action. Even Jesus Himself subscribed to utilitarian thinking, as He placed the precept of the ‘community’ above that of the individual. Notice also that Hitler fails to recollect an instance of a Jew defending Germanism in spite of his brethren? This is the key to understanding Hitler’s thinking on Jewry right here. He believed that because Jews—as a collective community that had been invited to live amongst Europeans—had collectively failed to condemn the disastrous, murderous, and destructive methods and policies of their leaders and academics, they had to reap the rotten fruit they had collectively sown. Hitler did not understand why the Jews could not offer up even one supportive thing in favor of Germanism, or what he had accomplished; Nay, they rejoiced in collectively tearing him down—both his person and his nation. They ridiculed and attacked the entire German nation, declared an international boycott against it, and convinced half the world that Hitler was a “madman who wanted to murder Jews and take over the world.” NetandYahoo is saying the exact same thing about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, so, do not listen to the flapping hole in Yahoo’s face that he calls a “mouth.” Everything the Jews say is a lie. Jesus Christ Himself, as well as Dr. Martin Luther, warned us of this fact. It is a self-evident truth, and the Jews will always act like you are some lunatic for believing so, but seriously, who cares what they think? They’re Jews. Nobody really cares what Jews think, except other Jews. We all know and feel this, but nobody is brave and honorable enough to say so—nobody except Ahmad that is. That is why he is a “lunatic” and, a “madman who wants to have another Holocaust and take over the world.”
Sure.
Hitler cited a specific case to support his point. He said, “I remember a Jewess who wrote against Eisner in the Bayrischer Kurier. But it was not in the interests of Germany that she became Eisner’s adversary, but for reasons of opportunism. She drew attention to the fact that, if people persevered in Eisner’s path, it might call down reprisals on the Jews. It’s the same tune as in the Fourth Commandment [“Love your neighbor as yourself”]. As soon as the Jews lay down an ethical principle, it’s with the object of some personal gain! Probably many Jews are not aware of the destructive power they represent. Now, he who destroys life is himself risking death. That’s the secret of what is happening to the Jews. Whose fault is it when a cat devours a mouse? The fault of the mouse, who has never done any harm to a cat” (Bormann, pp. 140-141)?
Hitler’s perceptiveness comes through in this passage, as well. Notice how he cites a first-hand observation to illustrate his point? This absurd notion that Hitler “blamed” Jews, merely out of expediency, is laughable. I cannot even believe that responsible scholars argue such a silly premise. Though, I can see why they do. The Jews and their bought-off Jewman lackeys argue this fairytale notion in order to make Hitler appear the fool and maniac that he wasn’t. It upholds the “Lampshade Land” principle, which serves as the centrum of post-WWII Jewish academia. Each little white lie feeds into the massive lie; thus, endowing the massive lie with greater continuity and brevity. You do not even know how many times I have had to listen to some Jew flapping off at the mouth about the testimonials of the “survivors,” or the “confessions” of tortured Nazis as “evidence” against the lie. This, too, is laughable. The alleged “survivors” would not have been in a position to know about any of the top secret goings-on at the camps, first of all; secondly, not even Eichmann would have been in the know, as to what might have been—all he did was transfer people from camp to camp—Hoess even less so; lastly, Speer told the Jews to “get lost” when they tried to pay him $25 million to admit that he knew “something” about the alleged Holocaust. This inanity on the behalf of Jewry has been documented in Gitta Sereny’s hate tract, Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth. It ought to be re-titled, Albert Speer: For Fear of the Jews.
Moving along to important things, the passage above also allows us to see that this particular Jewess didn’t give a damn about the Germans, only her fellow “co-religionists.” This can be seen in America today, no doubt, as the Jewish Neo-cons and their lackeys—like Levin, Chertoff, Pelosi, Liebermann, Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, Feingold, and all the other congressional Jewish clowns—generate one destructive policy after another. Hitler finally stomped his boot and took the necessary hard-line position against these leeches. Germany was falling apart, as is modern-day America; Hitler had to stop them. The thing that makes Hitler so awesome and special is that he took their money and then threw them out; in other words, their own money paid for their deportation and internment. That was a brilliant move against the Jewish bankers; foolish, but nevertheless, uncanny. As soon as Hitler pulled that rug out the Jews knew they were in a race against time. The sooner they pushed for war, the sooner Hitler’s bulwark would fall. Hence, the Second World War. To argue that Hitler didn’t see it coming would be folly, but he did not cause it. He just recognized that divine truth was still worth fighting and dying for.
Lastly, notice that the above passage indicts this pretentious Jewess for utilizing one of the Ten Commandments as a protective cloak merely for Jewish interests? Hitler resented that. He also seems to have understood that even though Jews may not have been aware of their destructiveness, they were, nevertheless, still to be held accountable for eliminating so much life with their wicked Bolshevik bloodbaths. Interestingly enough, Jesus said, “Bring the Jews before me and slay them” (Luke 19:27). In some versions of the Bible, the lexicon has been altered, in order to make it more Jew-friendly, but the old Catholic versions of the Bible name them as they really are—the Jews. Newer versions say “my enemies,” but, we all know from 1 John who Jesus was referring to. The Jews would water-down Mein Kampf if they could get away with it. Back to my previous point, even Jesus came to see the Jews for who they really were—“The children of the devil” (1 John)—so, He basically established the tenet of slaying Jews in His name. Jesus understood that it may well have been necessary, as He understood this struggle to be one of either life or death; the triumph of God, or the victory of Judeo-Luciferianism. Besides, Jesus also recognized that if Jewry could indiscriminately mass murder in the name of His nemesis Yahweh, then His people certainly had the right to defend themselves against this godless onslaught; indeed, He ordered His followers to do so in His name. Furthermore, Islam is no more violent or war-mongering than Judeo-Satanism. The Jews like Yahoo can’t cut their cake and eat it too.
Hitler Discusses Providence
Hitler explained to Bormann (2002):
“One day I explained to Eltz that what is conventionally called creation is probably an immovable thing, that only man’s conception of it is subject to variations. Why doesn’t God give everybody the possibility of understanding truth? Every man of average culture knows that at this precise moment the Catholic religion is of interest to just one tenth of the population of the globe. He’s astonished, too, that Providence [God], which has willed all that, can allow so many religions, all true from the point of view of those who practice them, to compete for the faith of the faithful. He knows, too, thanks to the view in depth that history enables him to take, that the Christian religion interests only those living in a tiny period of the life of mankind” (p. 341).
Hitler sardonically went on to remark: “God made men. But thanks to original sin we are men in the image of our world, earning our bread by the sweat of our brow” (Ibid.). Hitler believed that this teaching was part of the great lie; that is, the immature and preposterous Jewish concept of ‘Original Sin.’
He sarcastically carried on… “For five thousand years, God impassively contemplated the spectacle of which he is the author. Then one day He decided to send upon earth His only son. You remember the details of that complicated story” (Ibid.)!
Here, we can clearly see that Hitler took a somewhat disdainful approach to the Christian lie, which he believed not only belittled the life and work of Jesus, but more regrettably, had played an imperative role in the deaths of millions upon millions of its adherents; and, which had almost resulted in the genocide of the German people during the Thirty Years’ War. That is the part of Christianity that Hitler absolutely and utterly rejected, and for good reason. Many of those so-called “Christians” had actually been Jews, and, several “Catholic” Popes had actually been Jews incognito. The Jews had destroyed Christ’s religion, and Hitler made a point of repairing it. Kurt Ludecke (1938) had stated, “Hitler, no matter how vehemently he had denounced political clericalism, had always carefully distinguished between the temporal and spiritual spheres, and had never attacked the Catholic faith” (p. 241). Hitler had good reason to attack the Catholic Church, as it had not only waged war against the people, time and time again, but more regrettably, it had refused Church funerals to dead Catholic SA members. The Church also threatened to excommunicate Catholic Nazis, which certainly imparted a very negative image of the Church upon once-loyal Catholic and Protestant Christian Nazis (Ludecke, pp. 521-522). This was one reason why many Nazis turned away from the Church. Ludecke went on to say that, at one point, Hitler had told him, “It is a tragedy of the Germanic world that no German Heiland was born among us; that our organic, spiritual evolution was suddenly violently interrupted [Thirty Years’ War]; that Jesus was [subsequently] judaized, distorted, falsified, and an alien Asiatic [read: Jewish] spirit was forced upon us. That is a crime we must repair” (Ludecke, p. 521).
Hitler went on to sardonically tell Bormann (2002), “Those who don’t believe should, it seems, have faith imposed on them by force. If God is truly interested in men being enlightened, one wonders why He resorts to torture for that purpose.
“While we’re on the subject, let’s add that, even amongst those who claim to be good Catholics, very few really believe in this humbug. Only old women, who have given up everything because life has already withdrawn from them, go regularly to church. All that’s dead wood—and one shouldn’t waste one’s time in concerning oneself with such brains.
Hitler started to get a bit more serious at this point. He carried on by saying:
“In the trade union formed by the Church, many of the members have tangible interests to defend, and see no further. A given set of grimaces, certain people identify them with true religion. After that, let’s express surprise that these cynical exploiters of God are the true purveyors of atheism” (p. 342). In this passage, we can get a real clear idea of just how disdainfully Hitler felt towards both clericalism and atheism.
He went on to say, “Why should men fight to make their point of view triumph, if prayer should be enough? In the Spanish struggle, the clergy should have said: ‘We defend ourselves by the power of prayer.’ But they deemed it safer to finance a lot of heathens, so that Holy Church could save her skin.
“If I’m a poor devil and die without having had time to repent, I’m all right. But if, as a preliminary, I can dispose of ten marks to the Church’s benefit, my affairs appear in a more favorable light. And is that what God would have wanted?
“That little country girls and simple working men should be set dancing to that tune, that’s a thing that can be explained. But that intelligent men should make themselves accomplices to such superstitions, and that it’s because of these superstitions, and in the name of love, that hundreds of thousands of human beings have been exterminated in the course of history—that is something I cannot admit [read: allow].
“I shall never believe that what is founded on lies can endure forever. I believe in truth. I’m sure that, in the long run, truth must be victorious.
“It’s probable that, as regards religion, we are about to enter an era of tolerance. Everybody will be allowed to seek his own salvation in the way that suits him best. The ancient world knew this climate of tolerance. Nobody took to proselytizing” (Bormann, p. 342).
Relating Hitler’s Monologue to Modern Islam
I would like to briefly pause here and just touch upon the issue of Islam, because it very much relates to this passage. The Muslims have been subjected to the murderous and inane Judeo-Christian lie for so long, that they are now finally beginning to realize that these same ‘Judeo’ measures of destruction—that is, that the Jews and their false Christian Western lackeys have exacted upon the Muslims—must be copied and re-exacted upon them. To act as though the Muslims are religious fanatics is moot; this is not about religion, as religion is always and ever entwined with ethos. The Islamic struggle is about self-determination, and the will to survive, above all else. They have simply been exploited and oppressed by Judeo-Westerners and false Christians for too long; they have snapped, as was inevitable. The Nazis finally snapped, too.
If millions of Westerners and Jews get slaughtered in this struggle, then it will only be the victims of the slaughter who are to blame this time. A responsible people cannot honestly believe that other responsible people are going to allow themselves to be mass murdered, tortured, exploited, raped, pillaged, and oppressed eternally. No people wants to have to send their sons and daughters to blow themselves up in a struggle for existence and equality, but if that is the only measure that works, then there is no way one can possibly argue that it is unjustifiable. Because the irresponsible false Christians have allowed the West to become overthrown by Jews, and have allowed themselves to be used as merciless and murderous pawns in the little game called life, the West is now going to have to be held accountable. “Terror” is solely the fault of the West and the false Christians, for having allowed this satanic, materialistic, and genocidal Jewish fanaticism to declare war on mankind—with the assistance of Western and false Christian money, resources, and people.
The Jews are the enemy of everyone, and they are the ones who will get all of us killed; unless, of course, we elect to get control over them, dissolve their illegitimate state, and manage them from now on. That is the only way “terror” will ever be resolved. I will say it one more time…the state of Israel must be dissolved, the Jews must be forcibly expatriated from the region,—unless the Muslims actually want to allow them to stay—the Jewish banks and monetary systems throughout the world must be dismantled from the top down, and Jewry must be eternally managed by incorruptible liaisons. If we are not willing to do this then the world’s problems will remain unsolved, and millions upon millions of people will continue to die in the Jewish system. Hitler was the only one in recent history who was almost able to stop it. He came so close. Ahmad is our only modern-day hope at this point, as Europe, Mexico, Canada, Australia, and the U.S. are all controlled by Jewry. Russia and China, we can only hope, will not fall under Jewish consolidation and control. I think Putin is breaking the Jewish hold in Russia, but of that, I cannot be certain. Though, his alliance with Syria and Iran is promising. North Korea has been extremely effective in this necessary check on Jewish power, and there is no doubt China is standing absolutely back of Kim Jung Il. Although I do not believe Kim to be a very decent and honorable man, he is, nevertheless, a steadfast bulwark against Jewry. That is commendable.
Hitler Did Not Compromise with the Judeo-Christian Lie
Hitler went on to say:
“If I enter a church, it’s not with the idea of overturning idols (Bormann, p. 342). It’s to look for, and perhaps to find, beauties in which I’m interested.
“It would always be disagreeable for me to go down to posterity as a man who made concessions in this field. I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors—but to devote myself deliberately to error, that is something I cannot do. I shall never personally come to terms with the [Judeo-]Christian lie. In acting as I do, I’m very far from the wish to scandalize. But I rebel when I see the very idea of Providence [God] flouted in this fashion” (Bormann, p. 343).
Hitler took the Jewish lies that had manifested within the teachings of Christ very personally, and very seriously. He took God extremely seriously, and that belief, if nothing else, really comes through in this monologue. Over time, Hitler had become more and more inclined to a transcendental faith, albeit, with Christ-socialist underpinnings, but for obvious reasons. Let’s just face it, most Christians are usually fanatical maniacs, extremely gullible and uneducated, or con-artists, like the televangelists. That is not Christianity; I do not know exactly what that is, but there is no way that I am going to allow the teachings of Christ Almighty to be relegated to some lunatic pretending to be a pastor. I am ashamed of that. I am ashamed of American Christianity, as it is the ultimate in blaspheme and hypocrisy. American Christianity is not Christianity. It, too, is a lie, that has been manufactured for morons, exploiters of the people, and bigots. Everything they say and do is in contrast to what Christ had taught, but in line with what Jews espouse. Therefore, it has come to be the faith of lies. Martin Luther was a Christian. Adolf Hitler was a Christian. They followed Christ, and despaired of the Jews. The way you can identify a true Christian is how he or she approaches the Jews. Christians and Jews cannot ever, ever be friends. They can co-exist, but they can never ever be friends, or espouse the same views. Christianity was a reaction against Judaism, and to believe otherwise, is to perpetuate the greatest lie of the modern age. I am very much of the belief that Hitler’s Christianity was very much intertwined with his personal worldview, especially as regards his ideas about socialism—and this is one of the main reasons, other than purely financial, as to why the Jews absolutely and utterly revile his name. The Jews may actually hate Hitler even more than Jesus, but this would have to be verified. The very fact that Jews harbor so much hatred for Jesus and Adolf should only make us cling to them more ardently and steadfastly than ever.
The Jews are a living lie, so, if we are to believe Jesus Himself, that would mean that Hitler and his ethos are living truths. St. John said, “He who does what is evil has not seen God (The Third Epistle; John 11)…Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer” (1 John, 3:15); the Jews hate their Semitic-Arabian brethren, so they are “murderers.” “Whoever is not just is not of God” (1 John, 3:10); no people is as unjust as the Jews, with their genocide, racism, hatred, and mass murdering. “Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is the Antichrist who denies the Father and the Son [of Man]. No one who disowns the Son [of Man] has the Father” (1 John, 22-23); the Jews rejected Christ, brazenly blasphemed His name in their satanic Talmud of deception and lies, and, had Him murdered; thus, they are Antichrist, along with anyone else who has and does espouse their heinous worldview. Jesus had even told the foolish and hate-filled Jews, “The father from whom you are is the devil…when he tells a lie he speaks from his very nature…” (John 8:44).
Reflections on Hitler as Christ’s Advocate
I would briefly like to digress for just a moment, in order to ponder the precept that Hitler was the Advocate of Christ. I know that most “Christians,” if they can even be called this, believe that the Holy Spirit is the Advocate, but there are problems with this belief. To begin, let me first discuss the Catholic definition of the Advocate. Let us look at the evidence and the facts.
Hitler Was Not Antichrist
Hitler never denied the Christ, and as a matter of fact, had called Jesus “the true God” (Steigmann-Gall, p. 27), the “greatest anti-Semite of all time,” and the “great Creator of the concept of socialist redemption” (Wagener, p. 167); indeed, Hitler had actually claimed to be inspired directly of Christ and His teachings (Wag, pp. 57, 139-141, 167, 170); he had denounced the Jewish Old Testament as “the arsenal of the Antichrist” (Eckart, p. 57); he had refused to accept being donned a “Messiah” (Wag, p. 172; Bormann, p. 463), therefore, he neither believed himself to be a replacement for Christ, or the predicted satanic Jewish Messiah, which clears his name in both respects—he was neither Antichrist nor Solomon-Messiah; lastly, he believed in the resurrection of Christ, albeit, through His followers (Wag, p. 140).
Hitler As Advocate, not Antichrist: The Evidence
Hitler actually claimed that Jesus was finally, nay, truly being resurrected through National Socialism (Wag, p. 140). He said, “We are the first to exhume these teachings!” Now, how can Hitler be called “anti-Christian,” if St. John had even stated, “No one who abides in [Jesus] commits sin” (1 John, 3:6)? In other words, it is impossible to commit sin if one is truly following the teachings of Christ. Hitler had claimed on numerous occasions, in public, as well as private, to be an adherent of Christ. Furthermore, this biblical passage alone exonerates Hitler from any and all guilt for the persecution and internment of Jewry during WWII (which the Jews were almost solely responsible for), as Hitler had followed the exact words of the Bible; thus, he was doing the will of Christ, in His name, by opposing the devil’s reign. John goes on to say that those who commit sin do not know Christ, and are therefore of the devil—he is referring specifically to the Jews (1 John, 3:8); notice too, that John had just previous—to this—told us that true followers of Christ were incapable of sin. This is one reason as to why the Jews, as precious and kind as they are, revile Christians and want to burn the New Testament. It also means that Hitler was not guilty of any sin in his persecution of Jewry, as he had dealt with Europe’s Jews justly—in Christ’s name—and was therefore incapable of sin, as regards this particular issue. If one is a true adherent of Christ, then one cannot commit sin in His name, just as one cannot drive out the devil with Beelzebub.
You may take me to task on this and ask, “But, what if Hitler merely pretended to be an adherent of Christ?” I can only retort with evidence that serves to completely exonerate Hitler in this regard, as his actions, beliefs, notes, recorded conversations, speeches, and monologues overwhelmingly suggest that he was indeed a man after truth, Christ socialism, and the total dismantling and destruction of the Jewish-Antichrist system in place in the world, at the time. Hitler did not pretend, that I am absolutely certain about, beyond a reasonable doubt. Was he sometimes guilty of tailoring his remarks, making concessions that he would have rather not made, and political expediency? Of course. But that is moot, and pales in light of the evidence that can be stacked against it. I might just as easily use Ahmad as an example. Is Ahmad really a believer in Islam? Undoubtedly. Is he using certain people and possibly exploiting some non-Islamic groups and ideologies for the benefit of Islam? Of course. Is he making concessions with non-Islamists for financial and political reasons? Naturally. Does any of this discredit his faith or his ultimate goals? No. The same can undoubtedly be said of Hitler.
The anti-Gentilic Jew, Abe Foxman, of the racist, anti-Gentilic, Arabian-hating ADL, claims that the New Testament needs to be banned because it’s “anti-Semitic.” Good luck, Abe. This is one reason why Jews hate Hitler and Nazi-Soziism so much; because it was truly inspired of Christ. That is why Jewry became the nemesis of the Nazis. Hitler’s Christian faith could only carry him in the direction of holy war against the Jews because, if one really believes what Christ had taught, then one really cannot do otherwise. You cannot, or you cannot call yourself a Christian. But, this does not mean that it has to be, or should be, violent. In fact, violence is less likely to work against Jewry. Jews need to be completely boycotted and ignored. Remember, the Jews starved the Russians, Ukrainians, and Germans unto their deaths. They are not nice, and they are never decent once they have the upper hand. They can never be allowed to gain the upper hand in any nation-state. EVER!
Now, back to my previous point, I can only speculate that Islam has a very similar precept behind the teachings of Muhammed. I would also like to very briefly explain that Christians have been deceived on the issue of Jesus as “the Son of God.” You can, indeed, still be a Christian without adhering to the lie that Jesus was God’s immaculately conceived son. Jesus said, “Now is the Son of Man glorified” (John 13:31); He does not say “Son of God.” St. John clarified the truth later on. He said, “Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God” (1 John 5:1). So, the only necessity for being a child of God is the acceptance that Jesus was “the Christ”—the “anointed,” or “anointed one.” John does not say that one has to believe that Jesus was literally the birth-son of God. When the Apostles say “Son of God,” it does not mean God’s child; that is so ridiculous. The brevity of that precept is so much deeper and more spiritually profound than that, that the notion that Jesus was God’s baby is almost the most belittling Jewish lie of all. The precept of the “Son of God” entails the Word and Message of God, God’s teachings, via Jesus, in opposition to the evil one, the worldview of God, as opposed to that of Lucifer’s Jewish agents, the will of God, the deeds that God would have us do, and so much more. The title, the “Son of God,” is more than anything, the “Principle of God.” The best thing I can suggest is that anyone wishing to really understand Jesus must read and reflect upon the Gospel of St. John. He was, by and far, the most anti-Jewish, perceptive, and educated of the Apostles. Forget anything and everything that Rabbi Saul/Paul said, as he was nothing more than a Jewish liar and false convert. Hitler had lectured Bormann on this very issue, on more than one occasion, as recorded by Bormann himself in the table-talks.
It might be pertinent to mention that John had said of the Jews, “They are of the world, therefore of the world they speak and the world listens to them. We are of God. He who knows God listens to us…By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error” (1 John, 4:6).
The 1951 Catholic Bible offers this translation for the principle of the Advocate: “Intercessor,” from the Greek word “Paraclete.” Intercessor means “one who pleads on somebody’s behalf.” Furthermore, the Catholic Bible also assigns to this “Intercessor” a sex. The Advocate is referred to as “him,” and “he.” Lastly, the Catholic Bible says, of the Intercessor: the “function of the One thus designated is protection, assistance, defense” (1951 Catholic Bible: Holy Trinity Edition, p. 101). Hitler had undeniably protected, assisted, and defended Christ’s Empire; all in His name.
The translations of the Bible from Greek into English have revealed themselves to be rather unreliable, in many respects. Where the Holy Spirit of God is referred to as “Advocate,” and where this seemingly futuristic male “Advocate” is referred to, are not necessarily the same “Advocate”; also, John calls Jesus “the advocate” (1 John 2:1). Clearly, this is a problem. There are far too many references to advocates throughout the Bible, so, we must be very careful when we distinguish them. Undoubtedly, the Intercessor is not the same entity as the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the principle of inner divinity within man, whereas, the Intercessor-Advocate is explicitly referred to as a male. Jesus had stated that “He [the Advocate] would bear witness” concerning Him. It would not be at all out of line to believe that Hitler was His Intercessor, as Hitler, and Hitler alone, had fought to defend the Western-Christian Empire, which remains the only empire of Christ. If this empire falls, then Christ will have been defeated. It’s as simple and realistic as that.
Hitler was the only leader, during WWII, who fought and died for the Empire of Christ. To believe otherwise is to adhere to a lie, which will spell your demise. The Jews are the incarnation of Antichrist, and one need only observe what they did to the Persians, Amalekites, Spanish, Greeks, Romans, Russians, Germans, and now, Semitic-Arabians, Syrians, and Persians for proof of this self-evident, biblical truth. To espouse the Jewish worldview is to adhere to the false doctrine of Antichrist. This is why the Jews are trying so hard to get Christians and Muslims to revile and murder one another. We cannot allow the Jews to get away with this ideological warfare. Christians and Muslims can coexist; Hitler believed this to be an absolute necessity for a truly socialist and prosperous world. He willed to form a coalition of United Arian and Arab states that would coexist harmoniously, serving as a united entity, in order to check Jewish power for all time (Wag, 170-174). Since Jesus never condemned Arabs, or their beliefs, and Hitler greatly respected the Arabs, I will not, and can not, allow myself to believe otherwise. To be quite honest, and I really mean this, I would rather live in a fundamentalist Islamic Republic, and wear a burka, than live in a despondent Jewish world of debauchery, misery, murder, drugs, prostitution, normlessness, joblessness, homelessness, needless warfare, chaos, racism, hatred, oppression of freedom and religion, and despair. There is no way I will ever support a war with Iran; I will offer up my body as a shield for Ahmad before I will fight and die for a Jew. How could any true and honorable Christian fight and die on behalf of the people who murdered Christ and Hitler? That, to me, is the single greatest sin of all time.
Hitler had also stated, “My feelings as a Christian point me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter…to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized the Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! Was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. How terrific was his fight for the world against the Jewish poison…As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have a duty to be a fighter for truth and justice…For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people” (Baynes, p. 19-20). Jesus had stated, “No one comes to the Father but through me” (John 14:6). So, one cannot come to the Father through the so-called Jewish “Messiah,” as even St. John had said, “Those who deny the Christ deny the Father” (1 John 2:23). Jews deny the Christ. Hitler failed to do so. So, how can Hitler possibly be an/the Antichrist? This requires complete qualification, which will undoubtedly result in the confirmation that Jewry is the Antichrist. What kind of Christian questions what Jesus said, anyway? Jesus warned against both “false teachers” and “new teachers” (1 John 2:18-27). This means that the entire priesthood of the Christian religion is not following Christ’s teachings; every single one of them is at fault. Jesus said, via St. John, “And as for you let the anointing which you have received from Him, dwell in you, and you have NO NEED that ANYONE teach you” (1 John 2:27) [emphasis added]. Jesus is the only one that the true Christians follow; therefore, Hitler was a true Christian; he did not allow the false Christian priesthood to teach or tell him otherwise, because he followed Christ; Christ, alone. Hitler the true Christian Hitler went on to tell Bormann (2002), “It’s a great satisfaction for me to feel myself totally foreign to that world. But I shall feel that I’m in my proper place if, after my death, I find myself, together with people like me, on some sort of Olympus. I shall be in the company of the most enlightened spirits of all times. “I adopted a definite attitude on the 21 March 1933 when I refused to take part in the religious services [Ludecke had written about this, as mentioned above], organized by Potsdam by the two Churches [who had refused funerals for SA dead, and had also threatened to excommunicate Catholic Nazis], for the inauguration of the new Reichstag. I’ve never concerned myself, in the Party, with learning to which Church the men around me belonged, or did not belong. But if I were to die today, it would shock me to know that there’s a single ‘sky-pilot’ within a radius of ten kilometers around me. The idea that one of these fellows could bring me the slightest help would by itself make me despair of Providence” (Bormann, p. 343). Hitler was referring to the worthless military chaplains (Wikipedia, 2006). Here is a related song (1968): Sky Pilot
|