



|
An Unusual Case of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Presented Here Courtesy of AHRS
This single case of an extra long death by gasoline vehicle carbon monoxide poisoning [see below] suffices as enough evidence to debunk the diesel gassing theory of Raul Hilberg and his ilk of non-technically qualified disinformation “experts.” If even one case defies the norm then the entire theory must be discarded. That is the first rule of scientific theory and law. If any independent case study defies a law of science, then the law must be re-designated as theory, while acknowledging the one case of abnormal variance from the otherwise established pattern.
Keeping in mind this single case of an extra-long gasoline engine CO poisoning, one may reasonably assume that if the Germans had actually tried to commit mass-scale gassings with diesel engine exhaust, as supposedly described by Jewish “eyewitnesses” and Nazi officials like Kurt Gerstein, which has a significantly lower CO content than gasoline exhaust, there would have been numerous botched gassings and hundreds or thousands of the intended victims would have survived. The diesel gassing story is total nonsense, and one can say this even before delving into Henry Roques’s tour de force, The ‘Confessions’ of Kurt Gerstein. Diesel engine exhaust, unlike gasoline engine exhaust, contains sufficient enough levels of oxygen for fairly long-term breathing. In fact, the diesel exhaust would have provided oxygen for the intended victims. It would have cost far less money and time and actually have been effective had the Germans simply locked their intended victims in a small airtight room in order to suffocate them. The more people in the room the sooner they would have died. Introducing diesel exhaust into the room would actually have provided much needed oxygen for breathing. Oops.
Nobody in their right mind would commit mass gassings with diesel exhaust. They would, however, declare open season on Jewish people in the eastern occupied territories, as pondered by the late amateur historian Heinz Weichardt, or, they would have used wood-based or petroleum-based gasoline exhaust. They may have even shot their victims and buried them in massive pits just like the Jews and Soviet Russians did during the reign of terror in the former USSR. A mass grave was recently discovered in Ukraine—a grave with the remains of some 200,000 to 300,000 Polish victims of the Soviets and their Jewish overlords. Lest we forget that the Katyn Forest Massacre of ethnic Poles was also committed not by the “Nazis,” but by the Jewish-controlled Soviets. Until the Soviets come clean on the possible doctoring of the Einsatzgruppen reports we may also be quite certain that those numbers and details have been grossly exaggerated and falsified as well. I challenge anyone to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victims of the Einsatzgruppen units were “innocent Jewish women and children.” I would bet dollars to doughnuts that the victims were Communist criminals and murderers, perhaps accompanied by a few unfortunate innocents here and there, but which is regrettably what happens in every war.
According to retired Mechanical Engineer, Friedrich Berg,
“If the engine had been a diesel running under a heavy load, the maximum CO concentration would have been only 0.5% (only 1/10th the concentration of the Flanagan case). If the engine had been a diesel running only at idle–which is the most likely comparable running condition–the CO concentration would have been less than 0.1% (only 1/50th of the Flanagan case). What it all means is that death from diesel exhaust would have taken far, far longer than the 32 minutes claimed by Kurt Gerstein and every other self-proclaimed “eyewitness” to such alleged diesel gassings. All of those “eyewitnesses” are liars. Nearly 2 million Jews had supposedly been murdered at Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor and in the so-called “gas vans” with diesel exhaust. The evidence shows that those alleged gassings never happened because they were technically impossible.
It might be pertinent to note that their was a massive gasoline shortage in Germany during the war. This is why the Germans used producer gas, or wood-based gas. Would they really have wasted their valuable reserves on mass gassings when they could have simply locked these people in airtight rooms with no ventilation, or even have locked them up with no shelter to protect them from the cold during the winter? One need only use common sense to derail Jewry’s typical lies.
Mr. Berg has also mentioned the significance of the possible causal relationship between the rise in diesel powered vehicles and the decline of suicide rates in Denmark.
“The last of the three essays for which you provided links in the following e-mail mentions the effect of diesels on suicides in Denmark. On page 46 we have the following text:
‘A part of the explanation for the decrease in the number of suicides and the rate of car exhaust-gas suicides compared to all suicides, as proposed by Amos et al. [11], could be an increasing number of diesel engine cars, as these cars emit almost no carbon monoxide [19]. In 1992, 4.2% of all passenger cars were with a diesel engine compared to 5.7% in 2000 [22]” (Friedrich Berg, E-mail Communication, July 24, 2007).
Basically, what we have after these various analyses and findings is the nullification of Kurt Gerstein’s and others’ statements about diesel gassings. He lied—either of his own accord in order to sabotage his testimony, or, he had admitted to such ridiculousness under duress. Or, it is even possible that he lied for some other reason.
|